First debate as a novice

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: First debate as a novice

Postby hermod » 2 days 22 hours ago (Wed Jun 07, 2023 7:41 am)

Hektor wrote: They rather shut up about any of the problems with their 'star witnesses'. They'd rebuke on minor things, but never would consider there something to be wrong with their paradigm.


Nowhere to be found, but still real in their mind. They never use Occam's razor regarding the Holy Hollow Hoax...



"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: First debate as a novice

Postby hermod » 2 days 22 hours ago (Wed Jun 07, 2023 8:03 am)

Rockartisten wrote:How would it be possible to create such a conspiracy, someone would know? (sigh) :roll:


Atrocity propaganda is no conspiracy.
Atrocity propaganda is a powerful weapon of psychological warfare used by all democratic armies in all modern wars in order to "manufacture consent" (see Walter Lippmann & Edward Bernays) for the war effort of their own country and its allies.

And if there had been a conspiracy to resettle as many allegedly-dead Jews as possible on a stolen land, the person telling it would have been demonized and pushed down the memory hole (see what happened to British General Frederick Morgan when he publicly spoke about that in 1946) anyway.

British Gen. Fred Morgan and the Zionist planned 2nd Exodus
viewtopic.php?t=8948
"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: First debate as a novice

Postby Hektor » 2 days 20 hours ago (Wed Jun 07, 2023 10:31 am)

hermod wrote:
Hektor wrote: They rather shut up about any of the problems with their 'star witnesses'. They'd rebuke on minor things, but never would consider there something to be wrong with their paradigm.


Nowhere to be found, but still real in their mind. They never use Occam's razor regarding the Holy Hollow Hoax...
...


Apparently it can be downloaded here:
jstor.org/stable/i401907
But it has restriction... Perhaps it is online elsewhere.



hermod wrote:
Rockartisten wrote:How would it be possible to create such a conspiracy, someone would know? (sigh) :roll:


Atrocity propaganda is no conspiracy.
Atrocity propaganda is a powerful weapon of psychological warfare used by all democratic armies in all modern wars in order to "manufacture consent" (see Walter Lippmann & Edward Bernays) for the war effort of their own country and its allies.

And if there had been a conspiracy to resettle as many allegedly-dead Jews as possible on a stolen land, the person telling it would have been demonized and pushed down the memory hole (see what happened to British General Frederick Morgan when he publicly spoke about that in 1946) anyway.

British Gen. Fred Morgan and the Zionist planned 2nd Exodus
viewtopic.php?t=8948


Anything a multitude of people does do can be called a 'conspiracy'.
In this case it is a conspiracy theory that people were cooperating to create a monstrous narrative. It just happens to be conspiracy theory that is well documented and well established that they do so. So it's even a bit odd to call it a conspiracy, given the lack of secrecy. They openly engage in myth making and narrative creation.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Otium and 5 guests