Butterfangers wrote:bombsaway wrote:Not just human remains, but burnt bone fragments, which is evidence of cremation and body destruction. Such fragments being found on the surface of these sites 80 years after the events in question, yes is consistent with their description in orthodox literature. I think this photographic evidence fulfills one of your requests (for at least 1 mg of human remains)
What you're describing is that items which are relatively easy to obtain [from literally anyone's dead relative(s)] have shown up at surface level of 'Holocaust' sites to which many thousands of tourists visit each year. It's a site for which a particular narrative has powerful political incentives for those who maintain said narrative. Much like the nail-scratches in the Auschwitz 'chambers', there's no doubt that [Jewish?] tourists are willing to add their own "flair" to alleged 'extermination' sites to add dramatic effect and to maintain the narrative. Please don't make me also dig up the numerous examples of Jews caught lying about the Holohoax so people "wouldn't forget". It's the same motive for the same act: deception.
....
Is he serious? They found human bone fragments in a war zone of which some appear to have been charred. And that's the proof for the extermination narrative to be true. With that standard of evidence one could prove virtually any extermination one could possibly make up. So it is no proof at all.
It's also within consideration by Revisionists that people did die and were cremated at those sites. A few remains are more in line with the Revisionist version of events than with the Exterminationist one. And that's what the exterminationist side of the debate HAS TO first and foremost, before they even can be taken seriously. But that would cast doubt on their narrative and doubt endangers the believe system. They need general Belief in the public to uphold their cultic belief. It worked like this with the COVID-scam.
Posterior changes are also a possibility, but that's not where the 'lack of evidence' conclusion does rest on.
That the evidence in Auschwitz has been tampered with is also true. That alone should lead people to dismiss the assertions. It's obvious that the Communists tried to frame their most virulent enemies with all kinds of atrocity stories. That propaganda was often so crude that it should cast doubt in anyone dealing with the subject, but strangely most people don't... At least not openly. That behavior is suspicious in itself.
The frequent scaming by 'witnesses' and 'survivors' (most Jews from that area don't, they are either silent or themselves shocked to hear about the allegation after the war) is another alarm bell. But most people don't object openly to that neither. Taken the most flamboyant and fantastic allegations have vanished from the narrative taught nowadays. But that isn't done out of love to accuracy, it's done because those allegations have the potential of making the more intelligent parts of the audience suspicious. The shock and awe tactic is of course still there. The Holocaust brand management combined with movies and gossip makes sure of that.
The late attempts at 'forensics' aren't convincing at all. They confirm what Revisionists have hypothesized for a very long time already. There's nothing worse showing.... But Holocaustians can't let their Myth die. Because if it turns out to be false, they were the ones engaging in slander and telling lies for decades by now. Their arrogance doesn't allow them now to admit that they were wrong.
