I believe that a human pilot could not fly the plane into the WTC Towers, and this fact is positive proof that the whole 9/11 main stream media 9/11 story is a lie.
It is argued that many planes often land exactly on the center line of the airport runways, but there is much more involved with the perfectly flying of a plane into the WTC Towers.
(1) The speed of the planes hitting the WTC was very much faster than the speed when a plane lands on a runway. And the error distance of just a tiny direction error correction is much greater at a much higher speed, by a distance greater than the width of the WTC Towers.
(2) Flying into the WTC Towers at a higher speed also involved the much greater and very tight vertical positioning of the plane, where the plane could possibly go over the top or completely miss the bottom of the building and hit something else. On a runway landing a plane has many opportunities on a long runway to correct any possible vertical positioning error, but with the WTC there was no second chance to correct any vertical positioning error, and especially due to the much faster speed of the plane.
(3) The plane made a quick last second very large turn just before hitting the WTC Towers in order to allow the whole longer length of the wings to fit completely into the smaller width size of the WTC Towers. The perfect timing required for this perfect turn into the WTC Towers is impossible for a human pilot to accomplish, and only a computer controlled flight could have accomplished this perfect turn. A human could easily cause the plane to miss the whole building completely with this turn of the plane.
(4) The pilots on both planes that hit the two Towers were new to flying and had little flying experience.
I would appreciate any help with correcting any of my possible errors, and providing more complete information.
A human pilot could not fly the plane into the WTC Towers
Moderator: Moderator
Re: A human pilot could not fly the plane into the WTC Towers
(5) Another reason that a human did not fly the planes into the WTC Towers is because no trained pilot would ever have flown the planes past the plane's rated speeds at sea level, which these two planes did. Pilots are trained to know that every plane has a high capacity speed at every elevation level, because the air pressure against the plane will destroy the plane if the plane goes too fast for a particular elevation level. Planes must go slower at sea level due to the greater amount of air pressure. The conclusion then is that these two planes were specially reinforced inside the planes in order to prevent the planes from being destroyed due to the unsafe air pressure, and the planes were not normal planes. Also it is proof that the planes were flown by a computer control, because the unsafe air pressure made the planes similar to the F117 Nighthawk stealth fighter which can only fly due to a special partial computer assisting control.
Re: A human pilot could not fly the plane into the WTC Towers
(6) Only a computer controlled flight of these two planes could ever continuously monitor the intended direction of these planes, and quickly and perfectly correct any tiny errors in the horizontal and vertical direction of these planes, because the planes were going too fast for any successful human directional control.
At the very high speed of these planes, any tiny human direction error would possibly cause the planes to completely miss the WTC Towers.
Only a computer controlled flight could prevent and continuously correct any tiny directional errors of these planes.
At the very high speed of these planes, any tiny human direction error would possibly cause the planes to completely miss the WTC Towers.
Only a computer controlled flight could prevent and continuously correct any tiny directional errors of these planes.
Re: A human pilot could not fly the plane into the WTC Towers
Below is a web page that substantiates some of what I wrote before in this post:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/speed-like ... 5-02-2002/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/speed-like ... 5-02-2002/
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests