hermod wrote:....According to the orthodox narrative, the Zionist rabbi Stephen S. Wise had received some telegrams from a Zionist colleague in Switzerland (Gerhart Riegner) reporting "information" provided by a secret German informant whose identity was revealed several decades after the end of WWII (Eduard Schulte (see Laqueur in the 1980s)).
They got of course a rescue device there as well:
Reams served as the specialist on Jewish issues for the State Department's Division of European Affairs during World War II. In the role he downplayed reports of Nazi exterminations of Jews in Europe, casting doubts on diplomatic cables that sought to notify the United Nations and raise alarm. Reams concluded the reports of mass deportation and murder were accurate, but wrote in 1942 that if the State Department corroborated such information, it would have exposed governments to "increased pressure... to do something."[5]
Reams similarly resisted efforts in 1943 to potentially rescue Jews in Europe facing deportation and extermination. Reams wrote there was a "danger" that the German Government might agree to release Jewish refugees to the U.S., and that to care for such refugees would be an "onus" on the United Nations.[5] Between 1942 and 1944, Reams and his colleagues in the State Department resisted all efforts to save European Jews. Randolph Paul of the Treasury Department described Reams and his colleagues as an "underground movement... to let the Jews be killed."[5]
Essentially all they had is rumors and also people that had interest in those rumors. And Reams realized that there were negative consequences to affirming those rumors publicly. Guess he also had a sense of when something is a lie. If it is "to good to be true" for example.
Fact of the matter is. That what was/is alleged could not be kept secret. It however was a secret/unknown to most people that should have know. Hence one has to conclude that it simply did not happen and that was the reason for this being unknown.
But that's too much logic for those that enjoy basing their opinions on 'feels'.
