Moderator: Moderator
Lamprecht wrote:I guess Siegfried Verbeke should be added
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siegfried_Verbeke
Hektor wrote:Lamprecht wrote:I guess Siegfried Verbeke should be added
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siegfried_Verbeke
Is he presently imprisoned?
I could add some South Africans to the list, although they weren't imprisoned for "Holocaust Denial", there were lawsuits against those that distributed "Did six million really die" and one historian is actually imprisoned now, but was framed for "High Treason".
Alfred Schaefer — Support Détails
UPDATED: Aug 26, 2019 / November 22, 2019
Alfred was sentenced to 38 months imprisonment in Germany, starting from July 2018, for “incitement to hatred“, i.e., for telling the truth about the so-called “Holocaust“, and Organized jewry’s false flag attack on America on 9/11, 2001.
He also faces possibly further charges for making statements in his defense during his trial.
UPDATE: On August 8th, 2019 Alfred was given an additional 18 month sentence for his actions in his original trial. Please see this post for details:
Alfred Schaefer Receives 18 Months Additional Prison Time for Forbidden Speech During the 2018 Trial
Show your support for Alfred by writing (letters and/or cards) to him at the address below.PLEASE KEEP THE FOLLOWING IN MIND
— There are strict rules on what a prisoner can receive, i.e., letters, cards, postcards, photos, drawings, and stamps are the only permitted items.
— Alfred is receiving sufficient German stamps from supporters in Germany, so no need to send them from abroad.
— You can write anonymously, with no name or address, or use an alias. If you do put a return address, please ensure that it is genuine (if not, then mention that in your letter) so that his reply can get to you.
— Prisoners are only allowed to have 20 cards/postcards and 20 photos at one time in their cell. The rest are put in storage.
— Please write the date on each letter, card, etc. Also number them (letter/card 1, 2, 3, etc.) so that Alfred can see whether he is missing any.
— Do NOT send images of swastikas, or other pro-NS imagery.
— Books, magazines, objects, food, clothing, etc., should NOT be sent as, if even permissible, it involves a long and troublesome procedure to receive such items.
If you can, please try to send a letter or card on a regular basis, say, once a month or so! It’s a real morale boost for prisoners to know that they haven’t been forgotten about. And especially in Alfred’s case, as a political prisoner, it sends a message to the “authorities” that he is not alone in his views. Also don’t feel there’s a need to write anything profound of insightful, as even a simple “Hello” message is fine.
If you have any queries, etc., don’t hesitate to leave them in the Comment section.
Thank you.*****
Update 24 November, 2019: Alfred has been moved to Landsberg am Lech. The appeal from both sides regarding the new additional sentence for speaking in court has resulted in 8 additional months. See this post for an update:
Alfred Moving…Here is the new address to send letters or cards:
Alfred Schaefer
Hindenburgring 12
86899 Landsberg am Lech
Germany
Other political prisoners that would also welcome supportive letters and cards:
Ursula Haverbeck
JVA Bielefeld-Brackwede
z. Hd. Ursula Haverbeck
Umlostraße 100
33649 Bielefeld
GERMANY
Horst Mahler
JVA Brandenburg A.D. Havel,
Inhaftierter: Horst Mahler
Anton-Saefkow-Allee 22
14772 Brandenburg
GERMANY
Sylvia Stolz – new as of 26 May, 2019
Münchener Str. 33
86551 Aichach
Germany
http://jan27.org/January 27 — Honouring Revisionists Who Have Suffered Beatings, Imprisonment, Job Loss & Poverty for their Dissent
...
Our first order of business is to honor those holocaust revisionists who are now deceased, among them many of the very first pioneers who blazed the trail for those who followed. We list them here in order of the appearance of their first revisionist work, and we include the persecution they suffered at the hands of the entrenched “Holocaust” forces. Our esteemed honorees are:
Maurice Bardèche, France, Nuremberg or the Promised Land (1948); book seized and banned in France, author sentenced to a year in prison.
Paul Rassinier, France, Crossing the Line (1949), second book The Lie of Ulysses (1950); denounced in the French Natl. Assembly, taken to trial but acquitted, expelled from the French Socialist Party, the SFIO.
Louis Marshalko, Hungary, The World Conquerors: The Real War Criminals (1958); lived in exile from Soviet-ruled Hungary from 1945 on; was refused entry into the United States.
François Duprat, France. “The Mystery of the Gas Chambers” (1967 article); distributed French edition of Richard Verrall’s Did Six Million Really Die? (1974), Murdered by an automobile bomb blast that left his wife crippled; a “Jewish Remembrance Commando” claimed responsibility.
Louis Fitzgibbon, Britain, Katyn (1971) plus 6 other books on Katyn through 1979.
Thies Christophersen, Germany, Die Auschwitz-Lüge /The Auschwitz Lie (1973); served a year in prison, expelled from his homeland, forced to live in exile in Denmark (where his home and business were repeatedly attacked), Belgium, Switzerland and finally Spain until his death in 1997.
Friedrich Paul Berg, USA, Diesel Gas Chambers: Myth within a Myth (1983). In 1978, led a public demonstration against NBC’s television mini-series “Holocaust”. Lost his job as an engineer; devoted himself to the Revisionist cause, writing and speaking mainly on technical topics related to gassings.
William David McCalden, USA, Nuremberg and Other War Crimes Trials (1978), pen name Richard Harwood; first director of the Institute for Historical Review; attacked and beaten by Irv Rubin and the Jewish Defense League.
Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich, Germany, The Auschwitz Mythos (1979); dismissed from his position as a Judge with a reduced pension; University of Göttingen withdrew his Doctoral degree.
Robert Faurisson, France, letter published in Le Monde titled “The Problem of the Gas Chambers,” 1978. Key advisor and expert witness in 1985 and 1988 Ernst Zundel “Fake News Trials” in Toronto, Canada; arranged for Fred Leuchter to personally examine crematorium II at Birkenau resulting in the ground-breaking Leuchter Report. Wrote detailed critical analysis of Anne Frank Diary. Continually persecuted by Jewish organizations with numerous court cases, large fines, ten physical assaults including beaten nearly to death in 1989.
Bradley R. Smith, USA, Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist (1987), Break his Bones: Private life of a Holocaust Revisionist (2002), and two other books; founded Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH) in 1987; published Smith’s Report monthly newsletter from 1995 until his death in 2016; appeared on numerous national television and radio programs to defend his views. Threats and financial pressures forced him to move the CODOH operation and his family from Southern California to Baja Mexico.
Ernst Zündel, Canada/Germany, published and distributed Did Six Million Really Die?, prosecuted in 1985 and 1988 in the famous Canadian “False News” trials, his ’88 conviction overturned in 1992. In 1995, his home/business was firebombed by Jewish terrorists. Two years solitary confinement in Canadian high-security prison on German warrant, then 5 years imprisonment in Germany after a trial there. Released March 1, 2010, not allowed to return to his wife in the USA. Authored Setting the Record Straight: Letters from Cell #7 (2004).
Serge Thion, France, Vérité historique ou Vérité politique?/Historical Truth or Political Truth? (The question of the gas chambers)(1980). Une Allumette sur la banquise /A Matchstick on an Ice Flow (1993). Dismissed from his position as researcher at the National Centre for Scientific Research, condemned and fined by French Court of Appeal in 2002.
Henri Roques, France, The Confessions of Kurt Gerstein (1985), first man in the nearly eight-century history of French universities to have his doctorate “revoked” by government order.
Gerd Honsik, Austria, Freispruch für Hitler?/Acquittal for Hitler? (1988), writer and poet, given numerous fines and jail sentences in Austria, fled to Spain until extradited back to Austria on EU-wide arrest warrants in 2007. In 2009 sentenced to 5 years prison; paroled in 2011 due to age, moved to Hungary until his death in 2018.
Arthur Vogt, Switzerland, fined 6000DM for lecture on Sept. 1991 in Nuremberg. In May 1997 fined Sfr20,000 for editing and distributing the “holocaust-denial” journal Aurora.
Carl O. Nordling, Finland/Sweden, “How Many Jews Died in the German Concentration Camps?” (1991) Roger Garaudy, France, The Founding Myths of Modern Israel (1996); fined $50,000 in France.
Dariusz Ratajczak, Poland, “Tematy niebezpieczne/Dangerous Themes” (1999); book seized; dismissed from teaching at Opele University; banned from all Polish universities for three years; forced into menial, odd jobs. Discovered dead in his car in 2010. Dr. Robert H. Countess, USA, articles and reviews (2002-2004)
Special appreciation to:
Jürgen Rieger, Germany. Lawyer who successfully defended Ernst Zündel in 1981 and later – for this he was attacked and beaten unconscious, left near dead, his car blown up, his reputation and career ruined.
Doug Christie, Canada. Lawyer who defended Ernst Zundel in Canada for 20 years (1985-2005) – for this he was threatened by judges and law societies for “contempt” and “unprofessional conduct.”
To these men we owe our gratitude and our commitment to carry on so that their sacrifices, and those of others still living, will not have been made in vain. It’s a sad fact that in our societies, it is not acknowledged that REVISIONISTS HAVE RIGHTS TOO!
http://archive.fo/9CMiG | http://web.archive.org/web/2020/https:/ ... jail-term/French Court Sentences Holocaust Denier Vincent Reynouard to New Jail Term
November 26, 2020 3:07 pm
A notorious French Holocaust denier was jailed for four months by a court in Paris on Wednesday.
51-year-old Vincent Reynouard was convicted for posting a Holocaust denial video on YouTube in May 2017 — a grave offense in France, where the denial of Nazi atrocities has been a crime since 1990.
Reynouard is well-known in Holocaust denial circles in Europe, with a far-right pedigree stretching back to his teenage years. His first conviction came in 1991, after he distributed leaflets that denied the existence of the gas chambers among high school students.
Reynouard also has ties to Catholic fundamentalist groups that deny the Holocaust, including the Society of St. Pius X, which regards Jews as “enemies of the Church.”
More recently, he was sentenced to one year in prison and a fine of 20,000 euros in 2008; one year in prison in 2015; and two months in prison in 2016 — all for Holocaust denial offenses.
Reynouard’s latest conviction follows a 17-month-jail term for his fellow Holocaust denier, Hervé Lalin.
Lalin was jailed in September for a series of antisemitic postings on Facebook and Twitter, as well as for a video he published on YouTube in 2018 — called “The Jews, Incest and Hysteria” — in which he attacked Jews as a “people of incest.”
In a recent analysis of the French far right, the newspaper Liberation identified both Reynouard and Lalin as key members of a network of propagandists dedicated to the denial and distortion of the Holocaust. Other French deniers to have sparked concern include Jerome Bourbon, Alain Soral and Yvan Benedetti.
Lamprecht wrote:Reynouard has received another sentence just this week in Paris, for 4 months. Has Reynouard hit the world record in the highest number of convictions for "Holocaust denial"?
Check out the thread linked in my previous post on French president Macron saying he supports "Freedom of speech"http://archive.fo/9CMiG | http://web.archive.org/web/2020/https:/ ... jail-term/French Court Sentences Holocaust Denier Vincent Reynouard to New Jail Term
November 26, 2020 3:07 pm
A notorious French Holocaust denier was jailed for four months by a court in Paris on Wednesday.
51-year-old Vincent Reynouard was convicted for posting a Holocaust denial video on YouTube in May 2017 — a grave offense in France, where the denial of Nazi atrocities has been a crime since 1990.
Reynouard is well-known in Holocaust denial circles in Europe, with a far-right pedigree stretching back to his teenage years. His first conviction came in 1991, after he distributed leaflets that denied the existence of the gas chambers among high school students.
Reynouard also has ties to Catholic fundamentalist groups that deny the Holocaust, including the Society of St. Pius X, which regards Jews as “enemies of the Church.”
More recently, he was sentenced to one year in prison and a fine of 20,000 euros in 2008; one year in prison in 2015; and two months in prison in 2016 — all for Holocaust denial offenses.
Reynouard’s latest conviction follows a 17-month-jail term for his fellow Holocaust denier, Hervé Lalin.
Lalin was jailed in September for a series of antisemitic postings on Facebook and Twitter, as well as for a video he published on YouTube in 2018 — called “The Jews, Incest and Hysteria” — in which he attacked Jews as a “people of incest.”
In a recent analysis of the French far right, the newspaper Liberation identified both Reynouard and Lalin as key members of a network of propagandists dedicated to the denial and distortion of the Holocaust. Other French deniers to have sparked concern include Jerome Bourbon, Alain Soral and Yvan Benedetti.
On the other hand, the activist was released for having challenged, in two videos of May 13 and 14, 2017, the massacre of Oradour-sur-Glane committed by the SS Das Reich division, on June 10, 1944.
The court pointed out that this was a war crime and that "the challenge of such a crime, unlike its apology, is not susceptible of criminal qualification".
The law does indeed distinguish between "crime against humanity" and "war crime" and between "contestation" and "apology".
What the article does not mention or has "forgotten":On the other hand, the activist was released for having challenged, in two videos of May 13 and 14, 2017, the massacre of Oradour-sur-Glane committed by the SS Das Reich division, on June 10, 1944.
The court pointed out that this was a war crime and that "the challenge of such a crime, unlike its apology, is not susceptible of criminal qualification".
The law does indeed distinguish between "crime against humanity" and "war crime" and between "contestation" and "apology".
https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr ... 98836.html
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth.”
"Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past".
– George Orwell, 1984
Ursula Haverbeck sentenced to prison again
Dec 4, 2020
The 92-year-old Ursula Haverbeck has been sentenced to another prison term by a Berlin court. The district court of Berlin-Tiergarten imposed a one-year prison sentence without parole on Friday.
Ursula Haverbeck was sentenced to prison again just a few weeks after her release from prison. The Berlin-Tiergarten District Court imposed a one-year prison sentence on the 92-year-old on Friday. The judge reasoned that she was again guilty of sedition.
The 92-year-old from North Rhine-Westphalia, who did not come to the court to deliver the verdict, is charged with denying the Holocaust in an interview published on the Internet in March 2018....
Ursula Haverbeck: This is how the judge justifies the judgment against the Holocaust denier
December 4, 2020
At the very end of the trial against Holocaust denier Ursula Haverbeck, the judge in the Berlin-Tiergarten district court quotes Oskar Gröning – the former SS man who was convicted in 2015 at the age of 94 for complicity in murder in 300,000 cases. In the trial before the Lüneburg district court, Holocaust survivors reported about the horror in Auschwitz. Groening also spoke of the gas chambers, of the screams and of an SS man who threw a baby with full force against a truck.
Ursula Haverbeck was among the spectators in the 2015 trial against Gröning. That hasn’t changed anything about their propaganda. The 92-year-old continues to question the murder of millions of Jews. At the time, on the sidelines of the trial, NDR reporters asked Gröning what he was giving to Holocaust deniers. Groening’s answer: “They are irredeemably lost.” It is this sentence that the judge is now quoting in Berlin.
Ursula Haverbeck is also said to be “irredeemably lost”. The old woman doesn’t hear the judge’s sentence that day. On the first day of the trial she was still in the room. But the court has allowed her to stay away from the verdict. So she didn’t have to travel back to Berlin from North Rhine-Westphalia, where she lives. Anyway, it is out of the question that words could have any effect on the notorious Holocaust denier.
In an interview with a YouTuber who calls himself “Volkslehrer” and which he published in March 2018, Haverbeck played down and denied Nazi crimes. In the approximately 15-minute long video, she called for “to work to ensure that this lie, this burden of debt,” which lay on the German people, is “lifted”. Haverbeck denies the industrially organized mass murder of six million Jews. Haverbeck says she never got an answer to the question “where the six million Jews were gassed”.
“I find it unbearable to have to hear such statements,” says the judge in his verdict. “You are a mockery of the victims.” In absentia, the court sentenced Haverbeck to one year imprisonment, without parole, for sedition. The verdict is not yet legally binding.
It is not Haverbeck’s first conviction for sedition. The court does not believe that the 92-year-old will change her behavior either. “I fear that there is a risk of repetitions,” says the judge. But the purpose of punishment is not only to affect the individual, but also to sanction misconduct. The court took Haverbeck’s old age and the associated sensitivity to detention into mitigation.
The public prosecutor’s office had asked for a year and three months’ imprisonment. Haverbeck sells the “Auschwitz lie” as truth and denies the historical fact of the Holocaust.
The defender portrays her as a victim
Defense attorney Wolfram Nahrath presented his client as a victim in his closing lecture. Ursula Haverbeck was “a sensitive, sensitive and intelligent person”. Nahrath asks: “How do people like Frau Haverbeck have to be?” People who made themselves liable to prosecution if they expressed their convictions. These people are forced to remain silent. And that is a situation that makes you sick.
Haverbeck could not deny anything that she did not recognize as fact due to a “profound, firmly established misconception”, said the defense attorney. Nahrath urged the court to “show mercy.” “Isn’t it time to leave this old lady alone?” His client did not know that the “conversation” with the “people’s teacher” should be published. You have therefore not consented to publication. Nahrath requested acquittal.
Ursula Haverbeck knew exactly what she was doing – however, the court found. The interview was not a private conversation with Nikolai Nerling, the self-proclaimed “people’s teacher”. He greeted the audience with “Hello friends”, mentioned that “many” would now see their conversation, and Ursula Haverbeck also spoke into the camera. “The video was intended for publication,” says the judge – and Haverbeck was aware of that.
She wasn’t there, says Haverbeck
Haverbeck’s assertion that she only asked questions, the court exposes as a rhetorical device. From the context it can be seen that her statement that there was no evidence of the murder of millions of times should mean that there was no systematic mass murder.
On the first day of the trial, Haverbeck had said that she could not recognize the Holocaust as a fact because, although she was born during the Nazi era, she had not become an eyewitness to the crimes. She wasn’t there, she said.
“Personally, I have never seen the world from space,” says the judge, “but I know that the world is not flat.”
Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”
Users browsing this forum: Butterfangers and 5 guests
