March 1933: Hitler's Foreign Minister & Jewish atrocity lies

[hermod]

In March 1933, Hitler's Foreign Minister Konstantin von Neurath denounced the incipient campaign of anti-Nazi atrocity propaganda from abroad and he considered it "a deliberate, sudden rebirth of the vilification campaign conducted during the [First] World War against the German government". That vilification campaign was so intensive that, according to Neurath, "even the best organized administrative apparatus would not suffice to go to the bottom of each and every one of these malicious false reports and deny them". Among other things, there were atrocity stories of [Jewish] gouged eyes and cut-off ears very similar to the stories of chopped-off children's arms spread against Germany during WW1. To foreign Jews, Neurath said that they were rendering their co-religionists in Germany no service with their "distorted and untruthful news".

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 27,5975305 (p. 1 & 9, or the attachment below)

At that time, Hitler also denounced those Jewish "lies and slander of positively hair-raising perversity" from abroad.

"Lies and slander of positively hair-raising perversity"

German Chancellor Adolf Hitler said the following (in presumably a memorandum) to all organisations of the NSDAP in March 1933, in response to the boycott of German products led by American Jews. He perhaps foresaw what was in the pipeline; human soap, lampshades, shrunken heads, electrocution conveyor belts, steam chambers, etc, etc.

"Lies and slander of positively hair-raising perversity are being launched about Germany. Horror stories of dismembered Jewish corpses, gouged-out eyes, and hacked-off hands are circulated for the purpose of defaming the German Volk in the world for a second time, just as they had succeeded in doing once before in 1914. The animosity of millions of innocent human beings, peoples with whom the German Volk wishes only to live in peace, is being stirred up by these unscrupulous criminals. They want German goods and German labour to fall victim to the international boycott. It seems they think the misery in Germany is not bad enough as it is; they have to make it worse!"

They lie about Jewish females who have supposedly been killed; about Jewish girls allegedly being raped before the eyes of their parents; about cemeteries being ravaged! The whole thing is one big lie invented for the sole purpose of provoking a new world-war agitation!"

- Adolf Hitler, March 28, 1933

http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blog ... -hair.html

[Inquisitor]

And think how those same so-named criminals labored on perfecting their "atrocity" propaganda in the following decade! Little wonder that by then, so many were prepared to believe the utterly monstrous and totally implausible with ease.

[hermod]

Late March 1933: After a short phase of physical mistreatment of German Jews (by undisciplined Brown-shirted young men) and complaints from Jewish organizations led by Rabbi Stephen '6 million bleeding arguments in favor of Zionism' Wise, U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull investigated the situation and, on the basis of an investigation report by "the principal consulates in Germany", he assured Rabbi Stephen Wise that "this phase may be considered virtually terminated" after "Hitler [...] issued an order calling his followers to maintain law and order". That's why the American government didn't protest against the mistreatment of German Jews with the American Jewish Congress at that time. U.S. Secretaty of State Cordell Hull, later called the "Father of the United Nations" by President Roosevelt and honored with the Nobel Prize for Peace, also assured at that time that "he would continue to watch the situation [of German Jews] closely". In spite of this, Cordell Hull is now critized for his "inaction during the Holocaust" and because he advised President Roosevelt in 1939 to reject the SS St. Louis carrying 936 Jews seeking asylum, so sending these people back to Europe on the eve of the alleged "Nazi Holocaust". In fact, Cordell Hull was in good position to know what was real and what was just Zionist atrocity propaganda. In 1942, when the World Jewish Congress began making extermination claims and those claims were communicated to the US government, Secretary of State Cordell Hull and Undersecretary Sumner Wells were skeptical of the claims and suppressed them (http://www.holohoax101.org/201/).

In late March 1933, German officials also denied most of the allegations spread about Nazi Germany by Foreign Jewish newspapers, assuring that "such allegations are devoid of all foundation" and emanated "from sources which desire to poison the friendly relations between Germany and the United States and to discredit the new national government of Germany". Joseph Goebbels also announced at that time that his department was about to "launch sharp counter-active measures against those responsible for reports of atrocities against German Jews", stating that "Drastic legal proceedings will be undertaken against the atrocity campaign which has been unloosed in America and England by interested Jewish circles against the new German regime" and "A blow shall be struck at the intellectual movers and beneficiaries of those treasonable machinations, most of whom are Jews of German origin".

U.S. reports stating that German Jews were not physically mistreated and German official denials of atrocity propaganda against their country changed nothing and U.S. Zionists continued to organize anti-German/pro-Zionist marches and to spread horror stories in their newspapers as if nothing had happened until they were finally believed and the world really thought that 6 million had just been murdered by Nazi Germany in the chaos of WW2. Winston Churchill was so right when he said: "There is no such thing as public opinion. There is only published opinion."...


Zionist anti-German march, New York, May 1933

That makes me think about Chaplin depicting Nazi Germany as a hell on earth where Jews were constantly molested by sadistic stormtroopers in his movie "The Great Dictator" in 1940. The view of most people today about Nazi Germany and the Holohoax in fact looks like a Chaplin's grotesque cartoonish farce...



http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 89,5926798

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 659,471248

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 36,6384872

[hermod]

Additional newspaper articles about the early Zionist atrocity propaganda against nazi Germany and the German retaliatory "Anti-Lie Campaign"/one-day anti-Jewish boycott of April 1, 1933 (caused by the Jewish atrocity lies from abroad, especially from the United States, not by the anti-German boycott that had been started by U.S. Jewry one week earlier as often stated). Quite ironically, the German one-day "Anti-Lie Campaign" provided great material for Zionist atrocity propaganda as every good Holohoax 'documentary' uses pictures of SA troopers painting antisemitic things on the front window of Jewish shops on that day.


http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2 ... 020,758291


http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 16,5184885



http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 52,3669755




http://pdfs.jta.org/1933/1933-03-28_2510.pdf


http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 86,4547390



http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 25,2876501


http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 654,185117

[Carto's Cutlass Supreme]

I'm going to look at this thread more when I have time, but if it could be shown that atrocity allegations were ramped up in 1933, then it could be seen as a weapon. But if the other side is strong enough to push back, as Von Neurath did, and then the weapon of atrocity allegations is not so effective . It's just that in May 1945, they weren't strong enough to push back, and Belsen was discovered. That combination really put the holocaust myth in place.

[neugierig]

A while back I was made aware of a book by Dr. Fritz Hesse, “Das Spiel um Deutschland” (The Play for Germany, 1953). The Nestbeschmutzer Krausnick demonized it, I concluded therefore that it must contain material contradicting the story as told, and it does. Hesse was the chief of the German news service (DNB), stationed in London from 1935 to 1939. He was closely linked to the German embassy and most likely a traitor, Annelies von Ribbentrop writes that the London embassy was a hotbed for traitors.

Nevertheless, Hesse can be of use. He writes for instance that Hitler was taken aback at the amount of hatred coming from abroad after he had been appointed chancellor, and considered this to be a meddling in internal affairs. He received the worst press Imaginable, some went so far as to threaten with war. In fact, Hitler and his closest companions were of the opinion that they were already at war with the world. And that in February 1933! (pp21/22)

Hesse unfortunately provides no details, still, he admits that Hitler reacted to this. In other words, who knows how things would have turned out without this hate mongering.

Regards
Wilf

[hermod]

March 22, 1933: Stephen '6 million bleeding arguments in favor of Zionism' Wise's request to the U.S. State Department for an investigation about the alleged plight of Jews in Nazi Germany.

The Zionist atrocity propaganda machine was already running at full speed at that time and Stephen Wise hoped that the U.S. State Department would confirm those press 'reports', but he was disappointed a few days later, when the conclusion of State Secretary Cordell Hull's investigation was released (see above).

Interesting to note that when Stephen Wise was asked if he had definitive information about the alleged persecution of German Jews by the Nazis, he had to concede that he had none and could only say that some German Communist leaders had been jailed and some prominent German Jews had decided to hide or leave. Wise even used Einstein's exile as an alleged proof of anti-Jewish persecutions in Nazi Germany, arguing that Einstein was persecuted as a Jew, not because of any political activities. In spite of Wise's lies, it's known today that Einstein was a pro-Communist (admirer of Lenin) Zionist (later offered to be Israël's first president) activist already leading anti-Nazi political activities at that time. The example of Einstein's voluntary exile was one of the worst possible choices. But I guess Wise had no other option to sell his Zionist atrocity propaganda.

On the other hand, while he was depicting Nazi Germany as an antisemitic hell, Wise opposed a bill that offered to let the German Jews having relatives in America come to the United States. Wise argued that he opposed such a bill because the issue had to be settled in Germany, not in America. In fact, Wise opposed that bill because he wanted German and Eastern Jews in Palestine, not in the United States, as the Arch Zionist he was. For instance, one month earlier, in February 1933, Rabbi Wise was raising funds to make it possible for "thousands of Jews to escape from the Hell of Poland and go to Palestine".




http://www.jta.org/1933/03/23/archive/s ... es-followi
http://pdfs.jta.org/1933/1933-03-23_2506.pdf


http://www.jta.org/1933/02/19/archive/w ... ewish-life

[hermod]

April 1933: Rabbi Stephen S. (for "Six million bleeding arguments in favor of Zionism") Wise reportedly "requested not to use the State Department for an anti-Hitler sounding board" in his noisy Zionist campaign of atrocity propaganda for the opening of British-held Palestine (almost closed by the British White Paper of 1930) to Jewish mass immigration.


http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 42,3703753

[Hektor]

Additional newspaper articles about the early Zionist atrocity propaganda against nazi Germany and the German retaliatory "Anti-Lie Campaign"/one-day anti-Jewish boycott of April 1, 1933 (caused by the Jewish atrocity lies from abroad, especially from the United States, not by the anti-German boycott that had been started by U.S. Jewry one week earlier as often stated). Quite ironically, the German one-day "Anti-Lie Campaign" provided great material for Zionist atrocity propaganda as every good Holohoax 'documentary' uses pictures of SA troopers painting antisemitic things on the front window of Jewish shops on that day.
....

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 654,185117

Since I'm collecting historic data from Newspapers and archives, I can confirm that even Australian newspapers report on boycotts by Jews in Poland, England, the Baltic states etc.
The British parliament touches on the issue several times. First as a Jewish issue and later as part of an imaginary German threat to Britain.

[hermod]

Further interesting readings...


https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid= ... 4126&hl=en


https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid= ... 4021&hl=en

[hermod]

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article ... earchTerm=


England, March 1933

The Australian Consul-General for Germany reacting to "the untrue and grossly exaggerated reports alleging persecution of Jews in Germany":

https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid= ... 6501&hl=en

[hermod]

March 1933: Already "unparalleled German atrocities" with "Jewish babies thrown on bonfires" alleged by London Jews (through a "World Alliance for Combating Anti-Semitism", probably one of the paper organizations of which Zionists are so fond and seeming to disappear from the face of the earth after April 1933) and demands for the opening of Palestine to the unfortunate "persecuted Jews" from Germany. Classic Zionist atrocity propaganda. Zionists are so transparent...


http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article ... earchTerm=


http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article ... earchTerm=

[hermod]

The real purpose of that early Zionist campaign of atrocity propaganda became clearer in July 1933, "at the first important meeting of American Zionists since the Hitler catastrophe ("shoah" in Hebrew) hit Germany"...


https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid= ... 9306&hl=en

So the purpose of the vocal anti-German protests by Wise, Untermyer, Weizmann and other Zionists was the opening of Palestine's gates, at that time almost closed by the British "Passfield White Paper" of October 1930. ÜberZionist Stephen Wise was so pissed off by the "Passfield White Paper" that he had immediately 'celebrated' its passing by writing an anti-British book soberly entitled "The Great Betrayal". The Zionist campaign of atrocity propaganda about Nazi Germany was in fact an attack against Great Britain and its Palestine policy.

Guess how Wise reacted to the British "MacDonald White Paper" of May 1939 (which was even more restrictive than the "Passfield White Paper" and almost amounted to a death sentence for the Zionist dream)...

[hermod]

August 1933: The vet Zionist leader Samuel Untermyer, founder and president of the Keren Hayesod (Zionist fundraising organization) and former vice president of Rabbi Wise's American Jewish Congress, using atrocity propaganda to justify the Zionist "holy war" on Nazi Germany.

A Zionist atrocity propaganda that could have been written by a Soviet or Allied propagandist in 1944 or 1945: the whole content of Israël's founding myth, aka the "Holocaust", was already there...

The Jewish Telegraphic Agency:

http://www.jta.org/1933/08/08/archive/e ... -broadcast

The New York Times:

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/isra ... rmeyer.htm

Some people might believe that the World leader of the anti-German boycott was sincerely moved by the alleged plight of German Jewry. But in fact his noisy aggressive campaign was only aimed at inducing anti-Jewish measures in Germany (what would have boosted the Jewish immigration from Germany to Palestine) and at compelling the British government to let as many Jews as possible enter Palestine (at that time partly closed by the British "White Paper" of 1930) and settle there. Mere Zionist bamboozling.

Zionist leaders Samuel Untermyer and Stephen Wise were already campaigning against Britain with monster mass meetings and appeals to emotion before the British "White Paper" of 1930 had even been promulgated. Different methods, same purpose.


http://www.jta.org/1929/08/30/archive/h ... government

[hermod]

Another good example of early Zionist atrocity propaganda and Nazi denial. In July 1933, Zionist mogul Stephen Wise claimed that Dr. Michael Siegel, whose picture was at that time "one the most published photographs of anti-semitic activities by the Hitler battalions", had been murdered at Dachau. Interesting story because the Nazis "denied that the incident had ever taken place" and insisted "that the photograph was posed picture, taken outside of Germany, with fake Nazis in uniform", and also because Dr. Siegel was in fact alive and even escaped to Peru in August 1940, as conceded by the Yad Vashem.


http://bklyn.newspapers.com/image/59979026/

Yad Vashem's website:

Ich werde mich nie bei der Polizei beschweren - I will never again complain to the Police


Dr. Siegel, a Jewish lawyer, being marched in Munich under SA escort; the sign he wears reads: "I will never again complain to the Police".

In the book “The Pictorial History of the Holocaust” published by Yad Vashem, the picture (to the left) appears on page 26 with the accompanying caption:

"Dr. Spiegel, a Jewish lawyer, being marched in Munich under SA escort; the sign he wears reads: "I shall never again complain to the police". He was later murdered in the Dachau concentration camp."

The Photo Archives of Yad Vashem was contacted by Mr. Peter Sinclair concerning this photograph. In his email Peter Sinclair stated that the person referred to as Dr. Spiegel, was actually his father, Dr. Michael Siegel, and he did not perish in the Dachau concentration camp.

[...]

Two photographs of the incident were taken at two locations near each other by a professional photojournalist named Heinrich Sanden. He had used an old-fashioned professional camera with 9 x 12 plates rather than a roll film camera. Local newspapers refused to publish the pictures. As they were potentially of great danger to him personally, Sanden decided to get rid of the photographic plates as quickly as possible. He telephoned the Berlin agent of an American press agency, the “International News Photographic Service”, sold the plates to them and mailed them immediately to Berlin. The Berlin agent shipped the 2 plates to Washington DC. When the plates reached the newspaper, it became obvious that the writing on the board, which Dr. Siegel had carried around his neck, could not be read clearly owing to the relatively poor quality of the lens and the distance between the camera and the subject. The negative was touched up, based on Sanden’s recollections of what he had seen. Unfortunately, his memory was not entirely consistent or accurate. The photographs were published for the first time on the front page of the “Washington Times” on 23rd March 1933. The photographs were subsequently also published many times by the media throughout the world . They still appear now from time to time, in newspapers, books, school textbooks, exhibitions and on television.

Dr. Siegel and his wife escaped from Germany at the very last minute, in August 1940, to Lima, Peru. This journey began in Berlin on the Trans-Siberian Express via Moscow, Novo-Sibirsk, Omsk, Harbin, to Korea and then to Japan, followed by a Pacific ocean crossing to Los Angeles and then on to Peru.


The photograph depicts Dr. Siegel in September 1971, in Lima, Peru, wearing the German GROSSE VERDIENSTKREUZ (Grand Cross of Merit). Dr. Siegel was given this award by the German President on the occasion of his 89th birthday, in recognition of his services to improving the relationship between the German-Jewish Refugee Community in Lima and the post-war German Republic and also for his services as legal advisor on German and Peruvian Law to the German Embassy in Peru.


Source: http://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/exhibiti ... ns/siegel/