Gas Chamber Proof

[Sailor]

This is Nizkor’s (McVay’s) proof for the existence of gas chambers in Auschwitz:

The Honorable Thomas T. Johnson, on October 9, 1981, took judicial notice as follows:

Under Evidence Code Section 452(h), this court does take judicial notice of the fact that Jews were gassed to death at the Auschwitz Concentration Camp in Poland during the summer of 1944

and:

It just simply is a fact that falls within the definition of Evidence Code Section 452(h). It is not reasonably subject to dispute. And it is capable of immediate and accurate determination by resort to sources of reasonably indisputable accuracy. It is simply a fact.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/qar/qar05.html

[Hannover]

The court in this case again evaded responsibility by simply accepting the evasive maneuvers of Nuremberg.

At Nuremberg, the charter stated that the court was "not bound by technical rules of evidence". All allegations by the Allies were considered factual with no proof having been established. That's what's called a 'show trial'.

There has never been a forensic report substantiating gas chambers submitted at any post war trial. Revealing.

Consider this an open challenge to anyone who believes in these alleged 'gas chambers' to submit their points here and debate... free from namecalling, dodging, and subject changing.

- Hannover

[Sailor]

There was a lot of propaganda produced during WW II, by both sides, to be sure. Says the communist Jew Bruno Baum, who was stationed in German concentration camps during that time:

All the propaganda which started abroad about Auschwitz was initiated by us together with the help of our Polish comrades.[…]
I believe that it is no overstatement when I say that the largest part of the Auschwitz propaganda, which at that time was circulated throughout the world, was written by us in the camp.[…]
We continued with this propaganda for world wide publication up to the last day of our stay in Auschwitz.

Besides Baum there were other communist camp partisans participating in this activity:: Hermann Langbein, Ota Kraus, Erich Schön-Kulka, Rudolf Vrba, Filip Müller, Stanislaw Jankowski, Ella Lingens-Reiner and the long time director of the Auschwitz museum Kazimierz Smolen.

This propaganda garbage now is what the “legal experts”, the “cream of legal professionals” of the IMT, NMT and all the other trials, as well as present judges, are taking judicial notice to. And it is punished with prison terms of up to 5 years to doubt anything of it in Germany.

(Source: Bruno Baum, Widerstand in Auschwitz, Kongress-Verlag, Berlin 1957; Nachlaß Langbeins im DÖW, Wien: Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript Baums »Bericht über die Tätigkeit der KP im Konzentrationslager Auschwitz« vom Juni 1945 bei Wien; B. Baum »Wir funken aus der Hölle« in Deutsche Volkszeitung - Zentralorgan der KPD, Berlin 31.7.1945.)

Taken from:
Aus den Akten des Frankfurter Auschwitz-Prozesses, Teil 2 (in German)
(From the Files of the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, Part 2)
http://www.vho.org/VffG/2002/4/Rudolf473-478.html

[Hebden]

The court in this case again evaded responsibility by simply accepting the evasive maneuvers of Nuremberg.

At Nuremberg, the charter stated that the court was "not bound by technical rules of evidence". All allegations by the Allies were considered factual with no proof having been established. That's what's called a 'show trial'.

What about the allegations that the Germans were responsible for Katyn? If the court considered them factual, why did they not appear in the verdict?

[Moderator]

Hebden,

Perhaps you just don't get it or you refuse to read the guidelines. Staying on topic is paramount to effective debate.
This thread is about the alleged gas chambers, if you have a question about Katyn, then by all means ask it .... in a separate thread.
No one here will object to any question you have when asked within the corresponding topic.

Moderator