Claims of Lauri Torni being a "racist" and war criminal who shouldn't be given a good title in history

[NatSoc420]

I came across this video from a Marxist discussing the controversy behind a popular war figure named Lauri Torni, who was known for joining 3 armies to fight against Communism. He reacts to a video which calls him a "Badass in History" and the Marxist attempts to discredit his status as a "badass" because he was a "racist who considered Slavs Inferior" and was apart of the SS Wiking Division. Should Torni have his title and be remembered as a badass?

Video: https://www.tiktok.com/@pr0ud.snowflake/video/6986509193167604998?lang=en&is_copy_url=0&is_from_webapp=v1&sender_device=pc&sender_web_id=6986943169725466117
His source: https://studylib.net/doc/25378788/evalu ... auri-törni

[Otium]

What is there to dispute? Unless this Commie is disputing Törni's war record, there's hardly anything to discredit him being a "badass" whether he was a "racist" or not. It hardly makes any difference. All that's being said is that you cannot glorify someone, despite their impeccable military record, because they held the "wrong" political views. That's not an argument based on any facts, it's just an opinion. Why should this concern a revisionist forum?