Upcoming Debate (17 June): History Speaks v Mike Enoch

[HistorySpeaks]

We have agreed to do the debate on 17 June of this year. See this tweet for a screenshot of our email exchange agreeing to the debate.

I post the screenshot because I want to prevent Mike from going back on his commitment. If he follows through on doing the debate, I will delete my previous Substack post accusing him of dodging the debate, because (at that point) this charge would be false.

[Rockartisten]

What did he say after you said:

"17 June works for me. So we can now pin that down."

[Slobomoto]

Why do you debate Mike, when you can't handle yourself in debate here?

Mike isn't researcher, but he is spot on. You will lose.

[curioussoul]

So apparently Matt made a thread about himself on 4chan's /pol/ imageboard: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/426858948/

This is almost as unbelievable as it is narcissistic. As someone pointed out in the comments, this guy appears absolutely obsessed with somehow debunking revisionists, yet won't spend more than 5 minutes debating anything but shallow talking points. As soon as he encounters the least amount of intellectual resistance, he scurries away.

This is symptomatic of terminally online debunker-types. Knowing very little of actual revisionist arguments and the fact that literally all of his attempted debunkings have been refuted in actual revisionist research, made by actual people who have spent decades trawling through archives and traveling Europe, his narcissistic and shallow attempts at getting noticed within anti-revisionist circles are nothing short of pathetic.

Still looking forward to the debate with Enoch though, regardless of how stupid it might turn out to be.