New to Studying Revisionist Research: 3 Questions (Sonderkommandos & PPE, Krema Destruction, & Langfus 'Found Diary')

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: New to Studying Revisionist Research: 3 Questions (Sonderkommandos & PPE, Krema Destruction, & Langfus 'Found Diary'

Postby hermod » 3 weeks 12 hours ago (Fri May 19, 2023 7:01 pm)

Hektor wrote:
hermod wrote:
cold beer wrote:Exactly.
This thought has crossed my mind many times. The most important thing they would have shown in their flyover film at the liberation of Auschwitz is the crematoriums in ruin. But instead it's the one thing then didn't put on film!


Ditto for the alleged homicidal gas chamber at Dachau. In 1945, some American propagandists filmed everything in that room except the alleged chutes and grids for the introduction of Zyklon pellets, we're told. An absurd oddity. That's because the Zyklon chutes and grids were not there in 1945 and the alleged gassing procedure was changed in the meantime. In 1945, it was claimed that poison gas was introduced as a gas with a valve and now it is claimed that poison gas was introduced as a solid (Zyklon pellets) with a chute.
...

Now who added the chutes and grids and to what purpose?

This is actually so bad, it wasn't found believable, before the times of Martin Broszat.


The chutes and grids were probably added by some American army workers, necessarily between the moment someone told them Zyklon B was not gaseous (i.e. could not possibly have been released from shower faucets as alleged) and the moment Martin Unrein (a German ex-general employed by the American authorities in Germany) compelled Martin Broszat (a court historian of the US-controlled "Institute of Contemporary History") to deny the existence & use of a homicidal gas chamber at the Dachau concentration camp with a comment on the ridiculousness of that obvious fraud.











Image
"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: New to Studying Revisionist Research: 3 Questions (Sonderkommandos & PPE, Krema Destruction, & Langfus 'Found Diary'

Postby Hektor » 3 weeks 7 hours ago (Sat May 20, 2023 12:11 am)

hermod wrote:
Hektor wrote:
hermod wrote:
Ditto for the alleged homicidal gas chamber at Dachau. In 1945, some American propagandists filmed everything in that room except the alleged chutes and grids for the introduction of Zyklon pellets, we're told. An absurd oddity. That's because the Zyklon chutes and grids were not there in 1945 and the alleged gassing procedure was changed in the meantime. In 1945, it was claimed that poison gas was introduced as a gas with a valve and now it is claimed that poison gas was introduced as a solid (Zyklon pellets) with a chute.
...

Now who added the chutes and grids and to what purpose?

This is actually so bad, it wasn't found believable, before the times of Martin Broszat.


The chutes and grids were probably added by some American army workers, necessarily between the moment someone told them Zyklon B was not gaseous (i.e. could not possibly have been released from shower faucets as alleged) and the moment Martin Unrein (a German ex-general employed by the American authorities in Germany) compelled Martin Broszat (a court historian of the US-controlled "Institute of Contemporary History") to deny the existence & use of a homicidal gas chamber at the Dachau concentration camp with a comment on the ridiculousness of that obvious fraud.


....


Either design does not make sense.
Taken that the one with the pipes was more ridiculous.

But the run-of-the-mill visitor or reader will not really notice this. They see a building and they hear gas chamber, thus it is proven that the gas chambers existed. And people are fed with this information from an early age. That they drag school classes through Auschwitz is the case from the 1980s or 1990s. So one now deals with second generation Holocaust Believers. Anything they see is somehow 'proof for the Holocaust'... And it is like a cult. Critique of their evidences is seen as 'impious'. Critics are an incarnation of evil. This is a religio-social mechanism that reenforces the Holocaust.

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: New to Studying Revisionist Research: 3 Questions (Sonderkommandos & PPE, Krema Destruction, & Langfus 'Found Diary'

Postby hermod » 2 weeks 6 days ago (Sat May 20, 2023 11:06 am)

Hektor wrote:Either design does not make sense.
Taken that the one with the pipes was more ridiculous.


Anyway, the gassing-narrative change and the subsequent room alteration revealed the fraud and the intentionality of the deception if I'm asked.


Hektor wrote:But the run-of-the-mill visitor or reader will not really notice this. They see a building and they hear gas chamber, thus it is proven that the gas chambers existed. And people are fed with this information from an early age. That they drag school classes through Auschwitz is the case from the 1980s or 1990s. So one now deals with second generation Holocaust Believers. Anything they see is somehow 'proof for the Holocaust'... And it is like a cult. Critique of their evidences is seen as 'impious'. Critics are an incarnation of evil. This is a religio-social mechanism that reenforces the Holocaust.


Yes, they're braindead zombies. But teasing Holohoax bigots is fun. :wink:
"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: New to Studying Revisionist Research: 3 Questions (Sonderkommandos & PPE, Krema Destruction, & Langfus 'Found Diary'

Postby Hektor » 2 weeks 6 days ago (Sat May 20, 2023 3:17 pm)

hermod wrote:
Hektor wrote:Either design does not make sense.
Taken that the one with the pipes was more ridiculous.

Anyway, the gassing-narrative change and the subsequent room alteration revealed the fraud and the intentionality of the deception if I'm asked.
Hektor wrote:But ...Holocaust.

Yes, they're braindead zombies. But teasing Holohoax bigots is fun. :wink:



Imagine having no evidence for an accident (or for a murder case), but then repeating the accusation over and over again... And in the process changing the storyline of that supposed accident/murder over and over again, whenever you are caught out having talked nonsense.

The Holocaust does this with a twitch added, given that more people are involved with the accusing and the charge involves millions of people... they can have that run ad perpetuum.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests