Roosevelt's Road To War

[Mortimer]

Mark Weber has written an article on Roosevelt's secret dealings with British intelligence to bring about US entry into the war in Europe. The average American at the time had no inkling of the duplicity of which FDR was involved. If they did there is no way he would have won the 1940 election.l
http://www.unz.com/article/collusion-fr ... -into-war/

[Hektor]

There was definitely proof that Roosevelt knew about Pearl Harbour and thus entered the war on purpose.

From a confidential draft of David Irving's memoirs, I have a 16 page section on his meetings with Albert Speer and his memoirs. In it, he referenced other fake memoirs and diaries including those relevant to Roosevelt and his knowledge of Pearl Harbour:
....

The knowledge is one thing, worse is creating or rather provoking incidents to justify engaging in war with the Axis.


https://archive.org/details/Discussions ... 5/mode/2up

[Otium]

There was definitely proof that Roosevelt knew about Pearl Harbour and thus entered the war on purpose.

From a confidential draft of David Irving's memoirs, I have a 16 page section on his meetings with Albert Speer and his memoirs. In it, he referenced other fake memoirs and diaries including those relevant to Roosevelt and his knowledge of Pearl Harbour:
....

The knowledge is one thing, worse is creating or rather provoking incidents to justify engaging in war with the Axis.


https://archive.org/details/Discussions ... 5/mode/2up

The fact that he had knowledge of it and did nothing cannot be interpreted as innocent ignorance but deliberate withholding of the foreknowledge about this attack which he used as a casus belli to get the U.S. into the war.

This is why the powers that be hate the very idea of Roosevelt knowing about it, because they know full well it cannot even be classified as irresponsibility.

Kerry Bolton wrote a wonderful article detailing the entire American-Japanese debacle: https://www.inconvenienthistory.com/8/2/4165 Pearl Harbour was just the one incident the U.S. provoked to get into war. If it wasn't that it would've been something else.

Roosevelt was a warmongering prick and I hope, if hell exists, that he, along with his brothers in cabal, Churchill & Stalin, are in that 9th circle of hell being gnawed by Satan's three heads as the modern traitors to mankind.

[Mortimer]

George Racey Jordan was a major in the US military during WW2 who worked in supplying lend lease to the Soviet Union. Therefore he had first hand experience in these matters. He details how Roosevelt's orders were to give Stalin everything he wanted including atomic secrets.
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/jordan/01.html

[Hektor]

George Racey Jordan was a major in the US military during WW2 who worked in supplying lend lease to the Soviet Union. Therefore he had first hand experience in these matters. He details how Roosevelt's orders were to give Stalin everything he wanted including atomic secrets.
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/jordan/01.html

How not to write an introduction:

Before you read the shocking revelations from Major Jordan's Diaries about the billions of dollars, airplanes, tanks, munitions, foodstuffs, whole factories, blueprints and material for building the Atomic Bomb, personal luxuries for despotic Bolshevik Talmudic Communist rulers, as well as the paper and plates enabling them to print U.S. Federal Reserve Notes -- all this sent to the U.S.S.R. from UN Depot No 8, Newark, N.J., U.S.A., -- let us set the scene.

That simply would go past a normies internal censorship. And I can even fully understand that from a personal perspective. Overtly loaded language is good for railing up emotional people to create straw fires. But it's an obstacle for people that are searching for the truth to a matter.

I of course realise that there were quite some people in the US that had sympathy for the USSR for ideological reasons. They weren't necessarily Communists, but they wanted to move away from a more free market system towards a planned society that offered more security to especially middle + upper class people (While they often pretend doing this for poorer classes and workers mind, you). Middle class people secure jobs, by being employed in the bureaucracy or technical services -/- upper class people like to secure their business by having government keep smaller, more flexible competitors off their necks. That's achieved via regulations (creating red tape) and other barriers to entry.

[Mortimer]

George Racey Jordan was a major in the US military during WW2 who worked in supplying lend lease to the Soviet Union. Therefore he had first hand experience in these matters. He details how Roosevelt's orders were to give Stalin everything he wanted including atomic secrets.
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/jordan/01.html

How not to write an introduction:

Before you read the shocking revelations from Major Jordan's Diaries about the billions of dollars, airplanes, tanks, munitions, foodstuffs, whole factories, blueprints and material for building the Atomic Bomb, personal luxuries for despotic Bolshevik Talmudic Communist rulers, as well as the paper and plates enabling them to print U.S. Federal Reserve Notes -- all this sent to the U.S.S.R. from UN Depot No 8, Newark, N.J., U.S.A., -- let us set the scene.

That simply would go past a normies internal censorship. And I can even fully understand that from a personal perspective. Overtly loaded language is good for railing up emotional people to create straw fires. But it's an obstacle for people that are searching for the truth to a matter.
.

I disagree. Sometimes it takes a shock to the system to wake people up. Revisionism is not for shrinking violets - it can lead to jail time, fines, physical attacks, censorship and loss of your job. And besides the links between Jews and communism are well known.
https://codoh.com/library/document/the- ... on-and/en/

[Hektor]

George Racey Jordan was a major in the US military during WW2 who worked in supplying lend lease to the Soviet Union. Therefore he had first hand experience in these matters. He details how Roosevelt's orders were to give Stalin everything he wanted including atomic secrets.
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/jordan/01.html

How not to write an introduction:

Before you read the shocking revelations from Major Jordan's Diaries about the billions of dollars, airplanes, tanks, munitions, foodstuffs, whole factories, blueprints and material for building the Atomic Bomb, personal luxuries for despotic Bolshevik Talmudic Communist rulers, as well as the paper and plates enabling them to print U.S. Federal Reserve Notes -- all this sent to the U.S.S.R. from UN Depot No 8, Newark, N.J., U.S.A., -- let us set the scene.

That simply would go past a normies internal censorship. And I can even fully understand that from a personal perspective. Overtly loaded language is good for railing up emotional people to create straw fires. But it's an obstacle for people that are searching for the truth to a matter.
.

I disagree. Sometimes it takes a shock to the system to wake people up. Revisionism is not for shrinking violets - it can lead to jail time, fines, physical attacks, censorship and loss of your job. And besides the links between Jews and communism are well known.
https://codoh.com/library/document/the- ... on-and/en/

My point was not mentioning gruesome details one can prove. My point is adding emotive terms just for the shock value of it. In this case "talmudic" would be problematic. Although one could argue that talmudic traditions had influence on people of Jewish descent within the Bolshevik movement, Explaining this would take some time and a person should be given information and time to draw its own conclusions there.

I agree that Revisionism is not for sissies, but in the end we need people from all walks of life, not only the already disgruntled. Some people that could make a useful maybe discouraged to read further by overtly polemical terms. That's why one has to be as sober as possible in Revisionist literature, one needs however to keep the plot interesting, there I agree.

[Mortimer]

An article from Murray N. Rothbard The New Deal and the International Monetary System. It describes how the Roosevelt Administration considered the economic policies of the German government in the 1930s to be a threat to it's own financial existence. From the article "In the anti-German propaganda of the 1930s, the German barter deals were agreements in which Germany somehow invariably emerged as a coercive victor and exploiter of the other country involved, even though they were mutually agreed upon and therefore mutually beneficial exchanges." And "In the spring of 1935, the German ambassador to Washington, desperately anxious to bring an end to American political and economic warfare, asked the United States what Germany could do to end American hostilities. The American answer, which amounted to a demand for unconditional economic surrender, was that Germany abandon it's economic policy in favor of America."
http://www.ihr.org/other/RothbardNewDealWorldEconomy