David Chandler proves with simple Newtonian physics, why the collapse of world trade center building 7 at free fall on 9/11 is in contradiction with the official theory, i.e. the official theory violates the laws of phyiscs. The observed collapse points to the use of explosives and/or incendiaries for a controlled demolition.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... BmyPW6gGGI
6 WTC7 Part 5 47 Stories in 7 Seconds - ESO - Experts Speak Out
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/vid ... all-part-1
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/vid ... all-part-2
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/vid ... all-part-3
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/tec ... -7-on-9-11
Now that we know that building 7 didn't collaps due to office fires, we must find out who is responsibel for 9-11.
Well, we do have one clue. Chandler doesn't merely refute the official theory published by NIST, he proves that their analysis is fraudulent. Why should NIST cover up a crime? Go figure!
WTC-7 symmetrical free fall collapse
Moderator: Moderator
WTC-7 symmetrical free fall collapse
Last edited by Pia Kahn on Thu Jan 03, 2019 11:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.
If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
Re: WTC-7 symmetrical free fall collapse
sorry admin, i didn't want to post this twice. Please deleate the second post.
If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
