New to Studying Revisionist Research: 3 Questions (Sonderkommandos & PPE, Krema Destruction, & Langfus 'Found Diary')

[hermod]

Exactly.
This thought has crossed my mind many times. The most important thing they would have shown in their flyover film at the liberation of Auschwitz is the crematoriums in ruin. But instead it's the one thing then didn't put on film!

Ditto for the alleged homicidal gas chamber at Dachau. In 1945, some American propagandists filmed everything in that room except the alleged chutes and grids for the introduction of Zyklon pellets, we're told. An absurd oddity. That's because the Zyklon chutes and grids were not there in 1945 and the alleged gassing procedure was changed in the meantime. In 1945, it was claimed that poison gas was introduced as a gas with a valve and now it is claimed that poison gas was introduced as a solid (Zyklon pellets) with a chute.
...

Now who added the chutes and grids and to what purpose?

This is actually so bad, it wasn't found believable, before the times of Martin Broszat.

The chutes and grids were probably added by some American army workers, necessarily between the moment someone told them Zyklon B was not gaseous (i.e. could not possibly have been released from shower faucets as alleged) and the moment Martin Unrein (a German ex-general employed by the American authorities in Germany) compelled Martin Broszat (a court historian of the US-controlled "Institute of Contemporary History") to deny the existence & use of a homicidal gas chamber at the Dachau concentration camp with a comment on the ridiculousness of that obvious fraud.

https://postimg.cc/Jy91XPxS

https://postimg.cc/PLbNm0pt

https://postimg.cc/LJ7Q69KW

https://postimg.cc/0M9y3C49

https://postimg.cc/06prYjXM

[Hektor]

Ditto for the alleged homicidal gas chamber at Dachau. In 1945, some American propagandists filmed everything in that room except the alleged chutes and grids for the introduction of Zyklon pellets, we're told. An absurd oddity. That's because the Zyklon chutes and grids were not there in 1945 and the alleged gassing procedure was changed in the meantime. In 1945, it was claimed that poison gas was introduced as a gas with a valve and now it is claimed that poison gas was introduced as a solid (Zyklon pellets) with a chute.
...

Now who added the chutes and grids and to what purpose?

This is actually so bad, it wasn't found believable, before the times of Martin Broszat.

The chutes and grids were probably added by some American army workers, necessarily between the moment someone told them Zyklon B was not gaseous (i.e. could not possibly have been released from shower faucets as alleged) and the moment Martin Unrein (a German ex-general employed by the American authorities in Germany) compelled Martin Broszat (a court historian of the US-controlled "Institute of Contemporary History") to deny the existence & use of a homicidal gas chamber at the Dachau concentration camp with a comment on the ridiculousness of that obvious fraud.

https://postimg.cc/Jy91XPxS

....

Either design does not make sense.
Taken that the one with the pipes was more ridiculous.

But the run-of-the-mill visitor or reader will not really notice this. They see a building and they hear gas chamber, thus it is proven that the gas chambers existed. And people are fed with this information from an early age. That they drag school classes through Auschwitz is the case from the 1980s or 1990s. So one now deals with second generation Holocaust Believers. Anything they see is somehow 'proof for the Holocaust'... And it is like a cult. Critique of their evidences is seen as 'impious'. Critics are an incarnation of evil. This is a religio-social mechanism that reenforces the Holocaust.

[hermod]

Either design does not make sense.
Taken that the one with the pipes was more ridiculous.

Anyway, the gassing-narrative change and the subsequent room alteration revealed the fraud and the intentionality of the deception if I'm asked.

But the run-of-the-mill visitor or reader will not really notice this. They see a building and they hear gas chamber, thus it is proven that the gas chambers existed. And people are fed with this information from an early age. That they drag school classes through Auschwitz is the case from the 1980s or 1990s. So one now deals with second generation Holocaust Believers. Anything they see is somehow 'proof for the Holocaust'... And it is like a cult. Critique of their evidences is seen as 'impious'. Critics are an incarnation of evil. This is a religio-social mechanism that reenforces the Holocaust.

Yes, they're braindead zombies. But teasing Holohoax bigots is fun.

[Hektor]

Either design does not make sense.
Taken that the one with the pipes was more ridiculous.

Anyway, the gassing-narrative change and the subsequent room alteration revealed the fraud and the intentionality of the deception if I'm asked.

But ...Holocaust.

Yes, they're braindead zombies. But teasing Holohoax bigots is fun.

Imagine having no evidence for an accident (or for a murder case), but then repeating the accusation over and over again... And in the process changing the storyline of that supposed accident/murder over and over again, whenever you are caught out having talked nonsense.

The Holocaust does this with a twitch added, given that more people are involved with the accusing and the charge involves millions of people... they can have that run ad perpetuum.