How Did Hitler Die?

All aspects including lead-in to hostilities and results.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby Lamprecht » 2 years 3 months ago (Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:52 am)

Daniel wrote:This picture of Hitler's supposed dead double shows the face intact. But it's claimed that Hitler gave orders to have his body burned. So why the intact face? Shouldn't it be charred to the bone?

Just a hunch but those orders would have been given to his inner circle so the Soviets wouldn't have known about it.

borjastick wrote:Well us Revisionists cannot have it both ways. We claim it is impossible to burn corpses at mass murder sites in the open and leave no traces as claimed by the jews, but yet want to believe Hitler was burned to an unidentifiable crisp in the back yard of the bunker building and no evidence of such an event was ever found. Doesn't make sense.

One shoebox-sized amount of burnt remains is easy to get rid of.

Image

Over 1.5 thousand square meters of burnt bones (not to mention all the wood ash) on the other hand is impossible to hide, especially since it is claimed that huge quantities were dumped into enormous pits ("Olympic swimming pool sized" according to a poster here) ... and just covered with just a layer of dirt. And supposedly they know exactly where these massive pits are. At just one specific site!
Image

How exactly does one hide this:
Image
:?:
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer


NOTE: I am taking a leave of absence from revisionism to focus on other things. At this point, the ball is in their court to show the alleged massive pits full of human remains at the so-called "extermination camps." After 8 decades they still refuse to do this. I wonder why...

User avatar
borjastick
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3233
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby borjastick » 2 years 3 months ago (Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:58 am)

Lamprecht, theory and actual are two different things.
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

Daniel
Member
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 5:31 pm

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby Daniel » 2 years 3 months ago (Sat Feb 27, 2021 1:40 am)

Lamprecht wrote:
Daniel wrote:This picture of Hitler's supposed dead double shows the face intact. But it's claimed that Hitler gave orders to have his body burned. So why the intact face? Shouldn't it be charred to the bone?

Just a hunch but those orders would have been given to his inner circle so the Soviets wouldn't have known about it.



So the picture should be considered a confirmed fraud. It's Hitler's double? How did his double die? Who was his double? Haven't the WWII victors echoed the claim that Hitler's body was burned?

Otium

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby Otium » 2 years 3 months ago (Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:43 am)

The most recent account of how Hitler died and what happened to the bodies is the book 'What Really Happened: The Death of Hitler' by Robert J. Hutchinson which came out in September 2020.

death of hitler .jpg


I will base most of my post here on the epub version of his book, so forgive the lack of page numbers.


Around 6:00 p.m., Günsche ordered SS guard Ewald Lindloff to bury what was left of the bodies. Lindloff rolled the charred corpses onto a large sheet of canvas and moved them from the place where they had been burned to a deeper bomb crater about ten to fifeen feet in front of the bunker emergency exit, directly abutting the alley Hermann Göring Strasse.

bunker.PNG

According to eyewitnesses, the bodies of Hitler and Eva Braun were placed in a shallow ditch about six feet from the emergency exit of the Führerbunker (center left, shown in 1947), doused with gasoline, and set on fire. Erich Mansfeld, a guard in the conical tower, watched the events unfold. Deutsches Bundesarvhiv


Robert J. Hutchinson, What Really Happened: The Death of Hitler (Regnery Publishing Inc, 2020).


It was in this crater that a skull fragment and teeth were found. Not far from this crater the bodies of Hitler's dogs were found as well.

To make certain that the remains were those of Hitler, the Russians located Käthe Heusermann, a dental nurse who had helped Hitler’s dentist, Dr. Hugo Blaschke, install much of the Führer’s bridgework. According to an account first published in English in 2017, a Russian translator named Elena Rzhevskaya carried Hitler’s teeth around Berlin in early May 1945, looking for Heusermann. Heusermann claimed that she had held Hitler’s bridgework in her hands, and she drew for the Russians, from memory, an illustration of what Hitler’s teeth looked like.

The Russians also located the technician who made the gold bridge, Fritz Echtmann, who also drew detailed drawings of Hitler’s teeth. Both Heusermann and Echtmann were arrested by the Russians and held prisoner in Russia for nearly a decade, released only in 1956. For her help in identifying Hitler’s teeth, Heusermann would spend nearly a decade in Soviet prisons, most of the time in solitary confinement.

The dental nurse’s drawing of Hitler’s teeth matched the physical teeth held by Rzhevskaya exactly. Hitler had had extensive dental work. His teeth were in such bad shape, according to Rzhevskaya’s granddaughter, that the Führer had to have his dentist stay with him in the bunker.

Ibid.


It is true that the skull fragment didn't belong to Hitler, but the teeth probably did:

In the end, Dr. Charlier and his colleagues published the scientific results in the peer-reviewed journal, the European Journal of Internal Medicine, in May 2018.

Entitled “The Remains of Adolf Hitler: A Biomedical Analysis and Definitive Identification,” the study closes once and for all one of the greatest mysteries of the past century: whether Adolf Hitler committed suicide in Berlin on April 30, 1945, as he asserted he would do in his last will and testament and as all the surviving members of the Führerbunker claimed he did for decades afterwards—or, alternatively, the suicide story was an elaborate hoax perpetrated by the Nazis to cover up Hitler’s escape.

Along with the clearest full-color photographs of Hitler’s teeth ever published, the study asserts categorically that Hitler died in 1945. The dental remains, autopsy reports found in Russian archives, and X-rays found in U.S. archives provide, it says, “sufficient pieces of evidence in the definitive identification of the remains of the former Nazi leader Adolf Hitler.”

Ibid.


This is a photo of the teeth fragments from the study:

teeth-min.PNG
Here's the study, feel free to read it:
charlier2018.pdf
(446.81 KiB) Downloaded 101 times


Hutchinson agrees that those who are sceptical have some ground to be:

the skeptics will continue to point out that no one has Hitler’s actual dental records (they were lost in a mysterious plane crash) but only the drawings of his teeth made from memory by loyal, confirmed Nazis, such as his dentist.

They will also claim, rightly, that there were ways Hitler might have been able to evade capture by using secret tunnels and that Hitler’s supporters were planning for his escape by plane up until the very last days of the war. Hitler’s personal pilot, Hans Baur, had a plane standing by that could have theoretically whisked Hitler and Eva Braun away as late as the last week of April—as the successful aerial escape of Ritter von Greim and Hanna Reitsch on April 29 proves.

Ibid.


But ultimately there is just no proof that this happened, and no witnesses attest to this whatsoever. All the evidence, and all the witness testimony goes in one direction, and that is Hitler died in Berlin as he said he would:

Yet these inconclusive facts must be balanced by the overwhelming evidence that Hitler chose not to escape but to die, as he insisted he must, in Berlin. His personal will and his so-called political testament both contain assertions that he intended to commit suicide rather than fall into enemy hands. Three copies of these documents were all signed, witnessed, and dated and still exist.

The intelligence officers of both the Western Allies and the Russians repeatedly interrogated all of the surviving inhabitants of the Führerbunker—those held by the Russians, under torture—and these testimonies agree about what happened to a remarkable degree, while differing about minor details. What’s more, the eyewitnesses repeated their testimonies over the years in innumerable interviews and then in memoirs published thirty, forty, fifty, even sixty years or more after the war.

Ibid.


The fact that the Soviets pretended Hitler was still alive, and arrested his dentists is truly revealing and a huge indicator that Hitler was dead.

On the idea that Hitler escaped, Hutchinson says this:

While the evidence that Hitler died in Berlin is overwhelming, the evidence that he escaped is literally nonexistent—nothing more than scraps of hearsay contained in FBI and British intelligence files. These are claims made by often anonymous sources repeated to others and then sent in a letter, often years or decades later, to a government office.

As noted earlier, the History Channel’s three-year reality series Hunting Hitler begins with a report in recently declassified FBI files that a source had heard from someone that this someone had met Adolf Hitler on a beach in Argentina in July 1945. When you look up this report, however, you discover that it was actually from a Los Angeles Examiner reporter who met someone in a bar one night and, while drinking, was told this story.

The reporter did not have the source’s name and never saw him again, despite returning to the bar every day for more than a week. The claim in the preeminent “Hitler escaped” book Grey Wolf that Hitler was cared for by a German physician in Argentina comes from a man who said he read the physician’s memoirs but then lost them when he moved houses. All of the “Hitler escaped” books, documentaries, and TV series rely upon unconfirmed reports like these. They end up being investigations into facts no one disputes—the existence of a large German expat community in Argentina, the layout of subway tunnels in Berlin—but they provide no credible, corroborated evidence of their central claim: that Hitler escaped. Finally, and most significantly, the opening up of once Top Secret Soviet era files about the Nazi era proves conclusively that the Soviet leadership, from Stalin on down, deliberately spread the lie that Hitler escaped to further their own agendas.

Stalin lied to Truman’s face when he claimed that the Russians had no idea what had happened to Adolf Hitler. Stalin had already read the autopsy report that stated conclusively what had happened to Hitler: that what was left of his charred remains had been pulled from a shallow grave just a few feet in front of the Führerbunker’s emergency exit, taken to a military hospital in the nearby suburb of Buch, and positively identified by means of his elaborate and quite distinctive dental work.

Ibid.


You can reserve your judgement for a conclusion that will never come. I'm personally satisfied with the testimony and the evidence here - there's no reason to believe Hitler escaped, but every reason to believe he died the way he said he would.

You have to understand as well, that the fight to get the remining evidence examined, that of the teeth, was a task that took two years before the Russian government relented. They were not willing to admit they found the bodies of Hitler et al:

However, the bombshell 2009 claim that the Russians didn’t have Hitler’s skull after all—with the suggestion that there was perhaps less proof of Hitler’s suicide than previously believed—finally forced the secretive Russians to show more of their cards. In 2016, more than seventy years after the Soviet Army dug up the bodies of Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun in the bomb crater outside the Führerbunker, the Russian government finally permitted another investigative team to examine its files and examine the physical evidence in its possession.

Beginning in April 2016, two journalists—the French reporter and author Jean-Christophe Brisard and the Russian documentary filmmaker Lana Parshina—set out on a quest to determine once and for all whether or not the Russian government had the physical remains of Adolf Hitler in its possession. If it did, this would finally prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the German dictator died in April 1945 as eyewitnesses claimed and did not escape to live a life of ease in South America

As part of their two-year investigation, Brisard and Parshina had to do battle with seventy years of Soviet and then Russian deception and cover-ups—exacerbated by the hyper-secrecy that permeates all levels of the Russian government and by inter-departmental rivalries that persist to this day. As they recount in their definitive 2018 book, The Death of Hitler: The Final Word, the two investigators were constantly stymied by bureaucratic runarounds and one-upmanship. Letters and emails would go unanswered for months on end. Meetings and appointments would be canceled at the last minute. Yet a handful of helpful, sympathetic Russians in the top levels of the government came to their aid, getting them permission to examine physical evidence and to see top secret files to which no Westerner had ever been given access.

Ibid.


So, on the basis that the teeth were Hitler's, the bodies of a man and a woman found in a crater, as well as the dogs nearby were assumed to be that of Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun. Knowing what we know now the Soviets were probably correct. In any case, these remains as well as the remains of the Goebbels family was placed in ammunition boxes and buried:

The dental examination satisfied the Russian investigators that they had in fact found the remains of Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun.

As a result, the charred bones of Hitler, Braun, and the Goebbels family were taken from the autopsy examination room in Buch to Finow, a small town twenty-five miles northeast of Berlin. they were then reburied in the Brandenburg forest. According to the once-secret Soviet archives, they were placed in new boxes and, on June 3, 1945, buried “along the highway to Sterchow, near the village of Neu Friedrichsdorf.” Less than a year later, however, on February 23, 1946, the Soviets once again dug up the “half-rotten corpses” and reburied them in the courtyard of a house at 36 Westerndstrasse (now Klaussner Strasse 23) in the city of Magdeburg, located about one hundred miles west of Berlin.

The Soviet intelligence unit had a barracks in the town with a garage facility and a deep pit for working on vehicles. e bodies were placed in this large open pit and then covered over with dirt and eventually paved over with asphalt. And there the bodies remained, in secret, for twenty-five years.

Ibid.


And in April of 1970, the bodies were dug up from their resting place, incinerated and scattered:

In 1970, however, the military installation in Magdeburg was going to be transferred from the control of the Russians to that of Communist East Germany.

[...]

Under the code name Operation Archive, the Russians began the elaborate process of digging up the bodies of Hitler, Eva Braun, and the
Goebbelses. Andropov selected a KGB officer named Vladimir Gumenyuk to pick a secret final resting place for Hitler’s remains and to lead a threeman team in taking the remains there for destruction.

[...]

Posing as fishermen, Gumenyuk and his team drove to an isolated spot in a nearby forest. There they built two fires, one to cook some soup and another to incinerate the mortal remains of Adolf Hitler. As occurred nearly twenty-five years earlier, the Russians poured gasoline on the bones they had found and then lit them on fire. They waited patiently until only ashes were left, then ground everything into a pile of dust. ey scooped up the ashes and placed them in a rucksack.

The Russians then drove to a secret location—revealed later to be the Biederitz River, a tributary of the Ehle just west of the village of Biederitz 8—
and dumped the ashes into the rushing water.

The dénouement of Hitler’s reign took only twenty seconds. “It was over in no time at all,” Gumenyuk said. “I opened up the rucksack, the wind caught the ashes up in a little brown cloud, and in a second they were gone.”

Ibid.



As mentioned by Hutchinson, a book was published in 2018 entitled 'The Death of Hitler: The Final Word'. The authors produce images of the documents related to the burial and investigation of Hitler's body from the Russian archives. I would recommend just buying and reading these two books in full though. Because I've no doubt left out many details.
4c5da656-023b-4e53-965c-34e946953d40-Bookworm_Book_1.jpg

Again, what I quote from this book will be from an epub, so no page numbers.


My photographic session comes to an end. Tensions ease. I save Dmitri and his colleagues from Lana’s logorrhoea and thank them. They have played the game. At least partly, because we still haven’t seen any photographs from the time of the corpses of Hitler or Eva Braun. “There aren’t any,” Dmitri cuts in. Of course we don’t believe a word of it. But it doesn’t matter. We are pursuing our inquiry. The puzzle is slowly beginning to come together. It was the forensic examination carried out by Hitler’s personal dental prosthetist and his assistant that would have persuaded the Soviets in May 1945. They were the ones who laid hands on the body of the Nazi dictator.

“Before you leave, look at this…” Dmitri holds out one of the files that we hadn’t yet consulted. He opens it up on one of the bookmarks placed there earlier on. “This is what was done to Hitler’s body after it was formally authenticated.”

I avidly decipher a few words in the document. At the top of the page on the right, “Top Secret,” the general title, “File,” the date, “4 June 1945,” and the signatures as well as the stamp at the bottom of the page. Lana translates the rest for me:

As the result of later research on 5 May 1945, a few metres away from the place where the bodies of Goebbels and his wife were found, two badly burned bodies were found in the crater of a bomb: the body of the Reich Chancellor of Germany Adolf HITLER and the body of his wife Eva BRAUN. These two bodies were transported to the “SMERSH” counter-espionage of the 3rd Assault Army in the district of Buch in Berlin.

All the bodies brought to the “SMERSH” department of the 3rd Assault Army were subjected to a medico-legal examination and presented for identification to individuals who knew them well when they were alive.

After being subjected to medico-legal examination and the entire set of identification procedures, all the bodies were buried near the Berlin district of BUCH.

Because of the redeployment of the “SMERSH” counter-espionage department, the bodies were withdrawn and transported first to the area around the town of Finow [60 km north of Berlin], then on 3 June 1945 to a place near the town of Rathenow [80 km west of Berlin], where they were buried once and for all.

The bodies are in wooden boxes and have been buried at a depth of 1.7 metres and placed in the following order:

From East to West: HITLER, BRAUN Eva, GOEBBELS, Magda GOEBBELS, KREBS, the GOEBBELS children.

The western part of the grave also contains a basket with the bodies of dogs, one of which belonged to HITLER in person, and the other to BRAUN Eva.

The location of the buried bodies is as follows: Germany, province of Brandenburg, near the town of Rathenow, forest to the east of the town of Rathenow, on the motorway from Rathenow to Stechow, just before the village of Neu Friedrichsdorf, 325 metres from the railway bridge, gap in the forest, from the stone post number 111–to the north-east as far as the stone marker bearing the same number 111–635 metres. Then from that marker in the same direction to the next stone marker bearing the number 111–55 metres. From this third marker due east–26 metres.

The grave has been flattened out at ground level, and small pine seedlings have been planted on the surface forming the number 111. The map with the diagram is attached. This file exists in three copies.


I was also allowed to photograph a hand-drawn map, carefully coloured in green and red. It shows very precisely where the remains of the Nazi ruler were buried. The town of Rathenow was not chosen at random by the Soviets. This small town which had about ten thousand inhabitants in 1945 and was situated in the Red Army-controlled zone was easily and quickly accessible from Berlin.

document 1-min.PNG
Original of the secret report by Soviet counterespionage on the secret interment of Adolf Hitler and his wife, Eva Braun, on 4 June 1945 in the forest near Rathenow.
document 2 map-min.PNG

Original of the map drawn by Soviet counterespionage on 4 June 1945 showing the burial place of Hitler and his wife, Goebbels and his wife and General Krebs (TsA FSB).


Jean-Christiphe Brisard & Lana Parshina, The Death of Hitler: The Final Word (Da Capo Press, 2018).


After being buried at Rathenow, the bodies were moved to Magdeburg and left for 25 years.

For several months, the head of Soviet counter-espionage, Viktor Abakumov, had enjoyed almost total impunity in the chain of command of the USSR. Stalin had made him his new right-hand man. Abakumov took advantage of the fact to act as he saw fit.So on his own initiative, on 21 February 1946, the SMERSH officers based in Germany moved the corpses not only of Hitler, but also of Eva Braun, of the Goebbels family (parents and children) as well as that of General Krebs. Until now these bodies had been buried in a wood near the little town of Rathenow. No justification was given at the time to the Soviet authorities.

Top Secret

ACT

21 February 1946 3rd Shock Army of the Soviet Occupying Troops in Germany

The Commission [of SMERSH] has drawn up the present act stipulating that on the above date, in accordance with the instructions of the head of the counter-espionage service “SMERSH” of the Group of Soviet Occupying Troops in Germany, Lieutenant General Comrade Zelenin, near the town of Rathenow, we have exhumed a grave of bodies belonging to:

– German Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler.

– His wife Eva Braun.

– The Reich Propaganda Minister, Dr. Josef Goebbels.

– His wife Magda Goebbels and their children–son Helmut and daughters Hildegard, Heidrun, Holdine, Hedwig [only five out of six children are listed; Helga, the eldest daughter, is missing]

– The head of the general staff of the German Army, General Krebs.

All of these bodies, consumed by putrefaction, are in wooden boxes and have been transported in this state to the city of Magdeburg, to the headquarters of the counterespionage department “SMERSH” where they were reburied. They were buried at a depth of 2 metres in the courtyard of number 36 Westendstrasse, near the stone wall to the south of the courtyard, 25 metres from the garage wall of the house to the east. The grave has been filled with earth and flattened at ground level, giving the spot the appearance similar to the surrounding landscape.


Why move such important corpses? Abakumov did this to keep control of his “trophy.” The headquarters of SMERSH in Magdeburg, 150 kilometres south-west of Berlin, offered perfect protection against the “snoopers” of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. It was quite natural for the bodies to be
moved there. It was most important that they should not be taken to the Berlin hospital in Bunch for a new autopsy.

Ibid.


Reproduced in the book is also the documents from 1970 ordering the bodies to be dug up and cremated, but I'll refrain from quoting that document and posting the images of the documents.

Anyway, the 'evidence' seems to be clear, and no other explanation about what happened to Hitler is tenable.
Last edited by Otium on Sat Feb 27, 2021 6:05 am, edited 5 times in total.

Otium

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby Otium » 2 years 3 months ago (Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:53 am)

Daniel wrote:So the picture should be considered a confirmed fraud. It's Hitler's double? How did his double die? Who was his double? Haven't the WWII victors echoed the claim that Hitler's body was burned?


Nobody accepts that that photograph was a picture of Hitler, not historians, not the Russians, not the Western Allies - nobody.

The photo is not a fraud either. You can see the bullet hole in the forehead which isn't congruent with the testimony about Hitler's body and can thus be safely discarded.

Walking through the garden area, Voss saw the body of a man with a short, Hitler-like mustache, and announced that this could be his former leader—but then said he couldn’t be certain.

The man did look something like Hitler. He had clearly been shot in the forehead.

Yet Klimenko was not convinced. He returned to the prison, located more captured German officers, and brought them back to the bunker area. Most of them denied that the dead man was Hitler. Nevertheless, a photograph of this body—later suspected to have been that of Hitler’s official body double, Gustav Weler—aired in a newsreel released by the Soviets. For a few days, therefore, there were news reports that the Russians had found Hitler’s body.

But Klimenko kept digging, literally and figuratively.

A Russian private told Klimenko that he had found some badly burned corpses buried in a crater near the Führerbunker exit, close to the bodies of Joseph and Madga Goebbels. They were the bodies of a man and a woman.

At the time, Klimenko thought the body of the man shot in the forehead —likely the body double—was Hitler, so he assumed these new bodies were of other people and ordered them reburied.

Eventually, Klimenko was able to reach a former Soviet press attaché at the Berlin Embassy, a man named Andrei Smirnov, who had known Hitler personally. The investigators brought Smirnov to the bunker to inspect the man shot in the forehead. A group of generals all gathered around the corpse, now relocated to the bombed-out remains of the Reich Chancellery.

The Soviet press attaché was adamant: that was not Adolf Hitler.

Robert J. Hutchinson, What Really Happened: The Death of Hitler (Regnery Publishing Inc, 2020).


Hutchinson goes on to briefly mention a man named Mengerschausen, a guard who claimed to have seen everything from 600 yards away, and he claims to have seen the bodies taken out and buried in a crater outside the exist of the Führerbunker, where the bodies were subsequently found by the Russians.

But, as Anton Joachimsthaler points out in his book 'The Last Days of Hitler':

Mengershausen is a very peculiar sort of witness. On the one hand he made statements that are compatible with those of other witnesses and would therefore appear to be true; on the other he made statements that are so fundamentally different from anything all the others said that we must doubt their veracity. However, since Mengershausen was apparently, at least initially, regarded as the ‘key witness’ by the Russians—which did not spare him almost eleven years of captivity in various prisons and labour camps—we must deal with his testimony.

Anton Joachimsthaler, The Last Days of Hitler: The Legends, the Evidence, the Truth (Arms & Armour Press, 1998 edition.), Pp. 203ff.


You should probably read his book as well if you're so inclined to get all the details.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby Hektor » 2 years 3 months ago (Sat Feb 27, 2021 2:41 pm)

I don't know what happened to Hitler, but he didn't get a state funeral, now did he?

Perhaps that's why he is still spooking around in the mind of folks that will tell you how "anti-racist" and "antifascist", they are.

JohnnieDarko
Member
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:13 pm

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby JohnnieDarko » 1 year 3 months ago (Wed Feb 16, 2022 11:09 am)

Sorry to dig up this old thread guys, but his is subject that fascinated since my youth and then I've studied it for so long that I just want to give my input.

Well I think there's enough "evidence" to support both theories or at least to put some doubt in the air, has it sill happens. Dental records can be faked easily, the Bunker testemonials could be fake too, someone mention the loyal Otto Günsche well if Hitler had escape didn't he had the mission to protect his secret and make everyone believe he was dead? Haha the truth is the first testemonials of the Führerbunker had a lot of contradictions, and few people have seen really the Bodies, most of the saw 2 bodies being carried away in carpets. And it did not helped the fact the Bormann disappeared and at the time it was all he said she said, and very little evidence, the Russian did a terrible "csi" job. And there was a lot of information manipulation surrounding hitler's death.

All of this generate the perfect conspiracy theories, did he escape? Did he go hide in Argentina? After reading about everything in this subject my opinion is that in fact he could have escaped if he wanted, Bormann had a contingency plan for escape, and they could easy forged his death and moved for Argentina or any place. Someone talked about he has he bad shape and he wasn't going to live long, that's not true, he was in bad shape because of sleeplessness nights and detoxification of some of the things he was taking at the time, and the Parkinson thing is just also a theory is not proved, shakings could be also from withdrawal, and since he stopped Morrell from giving him anything the testemonials stated that his mind was a little bit more clearer, he was not completely delusional at the end but more sober.

I really believed he died in that day in Berlin as stated, he got to a terrible place were the war is lost and even Himmler betrayed him, so that took a toll on him, there was no hope or any reason to continue, atfer the Mussolini incident the burning of his body seems reasonable thought to wish to be burned. But for me the strongest evidence that he didn't survived and escaped the Bunker is the death of Goebbels, if he had any escaped plan he would included his most loyal follower, he loved Magda and he loved their children, I truly belive he wouldn't escape without them and leave them for dead in the Bunker. If there was a plan to fake his death it would included those people too, and they all could easily disappear days before and explode the Bunker and go underground, no one would know and they would dissappear they had more means that anyone that escaped, but they choose to die in Berlin.

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby hermod » 1 year 3 months ago (Wed Feb 16, 2022 12:05 pm)

Conspiracy theorists say:

    No corpses of gassed Jews = six million Jews died during WWII and the Nazis worked very hard in order to leave no physical evidence of their crimes behind

    No corpses of Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun = Hitler didn't die during WWII and he escaped to Argentina

The theory that Hitler might have seen his good reputation demolished by titanic Soviet-Allied lies after WWII without even writing or filming a well-constructed anti-defamatory response (to be released by some trustworthy followers after his alleged postwar death) is very implausible if not laughable. That doesn't sound very Hitlerian if I'm' asked.
"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

JohnnieDarko
Member
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:13 pm

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby JohnnieDarko » 1 year 3 months ago (Wed Feb 16, 2022 12:41 pm)

hermod wrote:The theory that Hitler might have seen his good reputation demolished by titanic Soviet-Allied lies after WWII without even writing or filming a well-constructed anti-defamatory response (to be released by some trustworthy followers after his alleged postwar death) is very implausible if not laughable. That doesn't sound very Hitlerian if I'm' asked.


Well after stalingrad one could say his actions were not very Hitlerian also, and more of derailed train. For one I think he was just too tired in the end to justify anything and what would be the point? Plus his testament is self-explanatory he even says: "Should the state also be destroyed, any further decision from me is no long necessary."

He knew perfectly what was going to happen. So why leave a film or anything? Have you ever read his political testament? It's very Hitlerian.

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby hermod » 1 year 3 months ago (Wed Feb 16, 2022 1:08 pm)

JohnnieDarko wrote:Well after stalingrad one could say his actions were not very Hitlerian also, and more of derailed train.


What actions exactly?


For one I think he was just too tired in the end to justify anything and what would be the point?


Setting the records straight. For posterity. For the decades following the immediate postwar years. For his numerous silent followers and admirers.


Plus his testament is self-explanatory he even says: "Should the state also be destroyed, any further decision from me is no long necessary."


He was talking about his personal belongings and houses. He wrote: "What I possess belongs - in so far as it has any value - to the Party. Should this no longer exist, to the State; should the State also be destroyed, no further decision of mine is necessary." He meant that the National Socialist Party should inherit his belongings, that the German state should inherit his belongings if there was no longer any National Socialist Party, and that his will about that didn't matter if there was no longer any German state. In other words, he merely said that the victors would do whatever they pleased with his belongings if there were no NS party and no German state to decide about that.


He knew perfectly what was going to happen. So why leave a film or anything? Have you ever read his political testament? It's very Hitlerian.


No, he didn't. He was a WWI veteran. He had seen the most abhorrent anti-German propaganda lies rise during WWI and fall a few years after the end of that war, when all the hatred had died out and a number of British propagandists had admitted their lies. He probably believed that the same thing would happen after the end of WWII.
"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

JohnnieDarko
Member
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:13 pm

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby JohnnieDarko » 1 year 3 months ago (Wed Feb 16, 2022 1:51 pm)

hermod wrote:
What actions exactly?


Every military decision. Those orders to fight to the last man and to not retreat are completely ludicrous from a military point of view, I can't recall from memory the numbers but he lost thousand of soldiers dead and thousand of captured soldiers. Even insisting on the taking os staligrad doesn't make any sense and he lost the war over those decisions and he lost most of this good soldiers during that period. Battle of the bulge was a really bad mistake too that made him lost unnecessary divisions that could help defend Germany.

hermod wrote:Setting the records straight. For posterity. For the decades following the immediate postwar years. For his numerous silent followers and admirers.


hermod wrote:No, he didn't. He was a WWI veteran. He had seen the most abhorrent anti-German propaganda lies rise during WWI and fall a few years after the end of that war, when all the hatred had died out and a number of British propagandists had admitted their lies. He probably believed that the same thing would happen after the end of WWII.


The WWI was a totally different war. Hitler was a smart man he knew that the type of war he got Germany into, and was nothing like the first war, in this war there was no record straightening, either you win or lose and the winners tell the story. And he also knew that his "silent followers and admirers" would know his actions, he explained them for years. As for the rest of the world he knew that was the end of the third reich, even his most faithful men knew it was the end, even if he wished there was nothing he could do to set the record straight simply because he lost, it would be more ammunition for the allies and more information to get out of context, he was not stupid. That and the fact that and the end he blames Germany for the defeat, his mindset at the end setting the record straight would probably sound worst for him because he was not in a good place mentally. That being said his political testament tries to embrace that, the best way he could do at the time.

He was talking about his personal belongings and houses. He wrote: "What I possess belongs - in so far as it has any value - to the Party. Should this no longer exist, to the State; should the State also be destroyed, no further decision of mine is necessary." He meant that the National Socialist Party should inherit his belongings, that the German state should inherit his belongings if there was no longer any National Socialist Party, and that his will about that didn't matter if there was no longer any German state. In other words, he merely said that the victors would do whatever they pleased with his belongings if there were no NS party and no German state to decide about that.


Sorry I stated that from memory and thought it was further down in the testament. But even in that context that's the words of a man who knows whats coming. I firmly belive that after the declaration of war to the united states and the invasion of russia it was clear for him that either we win all or lose all, there was no in-between.

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby hermod » 1 year 3 months ago (Wed Feb 16, 2022 7:00 pm)

JohnnieDarko wrote:
hermod wrote:
What actions exactly?


Every military decision. Those orders to fight to the last man and to not retreat are completely ludicrous from a military point of view, I can't recall from memory the numbers but he lost thousand of soldiers dead and thousand of captured soldiers. Even insisting on the taking os staligrad doesn't make any sense and he lost the war over those decisions and he lost most of this good soldiers during that period. Battle of the bulge was a really bad mistake too that made him lost unnecessary divisions that could help defend Germany.


The "no retreat" order is quite a distortion. Hitler didn't use the word 'retreat'. He rather used the word 'strategic withdrawals'. After the first "no retreat" order in mid December 1941 stabilized things on the Moscow front, Hitler authorized selective withdrawals. In late December 1942, he authorized Army Group A to withdraw in the Caucasus. In March 1943, he authorized the withdrawal from the RZHEV salient (“ Operation Buffalo) in order to generate reserves for CITADEL. He withdrew from the Kuban in September 1943. In late summer 1944, he authorized the retreat of German forces from Greece, the Aegean Islands, and southern Balkans.

The capture of Stalingrad meant control over the Volga, a vital transport route and a crucial access to the oil fields of the Caucasus.

Anyway there was no way the Axis could possibly win WWII. The leaders of the United States and the Soviet Union had planned the delayed entry of their armies into WWII before the war had even begun.

Image


And one must know that a large part of the info on WWII, the Third Reich and Hitler was provided by German traitors who had tried to murder Hitler and overthrow his government several times before and during the war. The 'info' provided by guys such as Halder are as reliable and unbiased as a History of the American Revolution by Benedict Arnold.






JohnnieDarko wrote:
hermod wrote:Setting the records straight. For posterity. For the decades following the immediate postwar years. For his numerous silent followers and admirers.


hermod wrote:No, he didn't. He was a WWI veteran. He had seen the most abhorrent anti-German propaganda lies rise during WWI and fall a few years after the end of that war, when all the hatred had died out and a number of British propagandists had admitted their lies. He probably believed that the same thing would happen after the end of WWII.


The WWI was a totally different war. Hitler was a smart man he knew that the type of war he got Germany into, and was nothing like the first war, in this war there was no record straightening, either you win or lose and the winners tell the story. And he also knew that his "silent followers and admirers" would know his actions, he explained them for years. As for the rest of the world he knew that was the end of the third reich, even his most faithful men knew it was the end, even if he wished there was nothing he could do to set the record straight simply because he lost, it would be more ammunition for the allies and more information to get out of context, he was not stupid. That and the fact that and the end he blames Germany for the defeat, his mindset at the end setting the record straight would probably sound worst for him because he was not in a good place mentally. That being said his political testament tries to embrace that, the best way he could do at the time.


No, WWII was a rehash of WWI. The winners of 1918 told the story of WWI too. But some British propagandists proudly boasted about their great achievements in mass deception after victory. And other British propagandists felt guilty about their wartime lies (which had caused many deaths) and "spilled the beans" about those lies during the interwar era. Results: many disillusioned & angry veterans regarding themselves The Lost Generation, most people very distrustful of media and politicians, and the victors' war booty hard to retain for a long time. But the politicians and propagandists of WWII had learned from the mistakes of their predecessors and sticked to their wartime propaganda lies after victory (show trials , revisionism banned, nonstop repetition of WWII propaganda lies, etc.). Results: the veterans of WWII portrayed as The Greatest Generation and ridiculously behaving as if they had saved the world, WWII regarded as The Good War, and the victors' war booty regarded as legitimate.



























JohnnieDarko wrote:
He was talking about his personal belongings and houses. He wrote: "What I possess belongs - in so far as it has any value - to the Party. Should this no longer exist, to the State; should the State also be destroyed, no further decision of mine is necessary." He meant that the National Socialist Party should inherit his belongings, that the German state should inherit his belongings if there was no longer any National Socialist Party, and that his will about that didn't matter if there was no longer any German state. In other words, he merely said that the victors would do whatever they pleased with his belongings if there were no NS party and no German state to decide about that.


Sorry I stated that from memory and thought it was further down in the testament. But even in that context that's the words of a man who knows whats coming.


A man "who knows what's coming" wouldn't have talked about the possibility of a continuation of the National Socialist Party and a German state similar to the pre-war one.
"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

JohnnieDarko
Member
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:13 pm

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby JohnnieDarko » 1 year 3 months ago (Wed Feb 16, 2022 8:18 pm)

hermod wrote:The "no retreat" order is quite a distortion. Hitler didn't use the word 'retreat'. He rather used the word 'strategic withdrawals'. After the first "no retreat" order in mid December 1941 stabilized things on the Moscow front, Hitler authorized selective withdrawals. In late December 1942, he authorized Army Group A to withdraw in the Caucasus. In March 1943, he authorized the withdrawal from the RZHEV salient (“ Operation Buffalo) in order to generate reserves for CITADEL. He withdrew from the Kuban in September 1943. In late summer 1944, he authorized the retreat of German forces from Greece, the Aegean Islands, and southern Balkans.


Are you serious? Those retreats were strategic for another battles and with pressure from the high command. North Africa and stalingrad were terrible tactical mistakes and there was more battles I can't rember by memory that no withdrawal order led to Germans troops being captured for no good reason.

hermod wrote:The capture of Stalingrad meant control over the Volga, a vital transport route and a crucial access to the oil fields of the Caucasus.


The capture of stalingrad were a pure egomanical decision, they could have went straight to the caucasus and simply maintaining the front and secure the oil fields, instead they split and opened up a larger front that they could not maintain, that's why they ended up losing up the Russian front.

hermod wrote:Anyway there was no way the Axis could possibly win WWII. The leaders of the United States and the Soviet Union had planned the delayed entry of their armies into WWII before the war had even begun.


Sorry but that's completely false, and they could have win specially if they didn't invade Russia at that time. Nazi germany made 3 big mistakes, the first one was Italia as a ally, nothing but dead weight, Hitler should had controlled the Italians right way from the start and when he did was too late, second declaring war on the United States and giving Churchill what he wanted, and third the Russian invasion. They could have won the war simply by maintaining the conquered territory and not engaging Russia until the right time cams. They were greedy instead of being patient cause if they took the time to defend the conquered territory and create more armament and not losing entire divisions they would conquered all Europe. They just wanted too much too quickly without enough resources.

As for much information coming from traitors that's also not true, we saw the outcome of these unnecessary battles, it's not rocket science, once you open multiple fronts you're up to defeat period. No nations who fought on multiple fronts won to this day, engaging Russia at that time was a mistake.

hermod wrote:No, WWII was a rehash of WWI. The winners of 1918 told the story of WWI too. But some British propagandists proudly boasted about their great achievements in mass deception after victory. And other British propagandists felt guilty about their wartime lies (which had caused many deaths) and "spilled the beans" about those lies during the interwar era. Results: many disillusioned & angry veterans regarding themselves The Lost Generation, most people very distrustful of media and politicians, and the victors' war booty hard to retain for a long time. But the politicians and propagandists of WWII had learned from the mistakes of their predecessors and sticked to their wartime propaganda lies after victory (show trials , revisionism banned, nonstop repetition of WWII propaganda lies, etc.). Results: the veterans of WWII portrayed as The Greatest Generation and ridiculously behaving as if they had saved the world, WWII regarded as The Good War, and the victors' war booty regarded as legitimate.


I'm not talking about propaganda, I'm talking about warfare, the ww2 is a completely different war, the Germans conquered almost the entire Europe, a good part of Russia, destroyed hundred of ships in the Atlantic, bomb the hell of England, burned cities to the ground. It was a completely different type of warfare and the consequences were equally brutal, allies bombing civilians, war crimes happening on both sides. Hitler knew this, like I've said before it was all of nothing if they lost everything was lost there was room for the future, and that was in fact what happened, it wouldn't make any difference leaving messages or stating anything because he knew it wouldn't matter with the allies winning. Nations who won tell the tale and that's it.

hermod wrote:A man "who knows what's coming" wouldn't have talked about the possibility of a continuation of the National Socialist Party and a German state similar to the pre-war one.


Not really because he just stating things, that's not a phrase of hope, that's the recognition of the possible outcome. And he was right that was the outcome was not? Because if he knew there was a single chance he would not killed himself. Again we knew what type of war he was fighting and he lost plain and simple, that's why he was so afraid of being caught alive.

Otium

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby Otium » 1 year 3 months ago (Wed Feb 16, 2022 8:19 pm)

hermod wrote:The "no retreat" order is quite a distortion. Hitler didn't use the word 'retreat'. He rather used the word 'strategic withdrawals'. After the first "no retreat" order in mid December 1941 stabilized things on the Moscow front, Hitler authorized selective withdrawals. In late December 1942, he authorized Army Group A to withdraw in the Caucasus. In March 1943, he authorized the withdrawal from the RZHEV salient (“ Operation Buffalo) in order to generate reserves for CITADEL. He withdrew from the Kuban in September 1943. In late summer 1944, he authorized the retreat of German forces from Greece, the Aegean Islands, and southern Balkans.

The capture of Stalingrad meant control over the Volga, a vital transport route and a crucial access to the oil fields of the Caucasus.


I agree, Hitler's decisions were often distorted by his Generals and then blamed on Hitler. The common view that Hitler should've withdrawn from the Eastern front was contentious among the staff at the OKW. It's not as if Hitler didn't have good reasons not to withdraw. For example, von Bock saw "'his forces’ position growing even more serious" on the night of Tuesday, December 16, 1941, and called on Schmundt to see if Brauchitsch had relayed the situation report to Hitler, which he hadn't. Bock then told Schmundt to ask Hitler to "decide whether or not to retreat". It didn't seem to matter in any case, for if his army retreated they would have no equipment with which to hold the new line, because they would've had to leave it all where they currently were. So to stay with the equipment you had which served you a much better chance at fighting and winning was the better option:

Schmundt then said that Hitler did not believe he could sacrifice everything because of a couple of breakthroughs; he had taken everything into his own hands, Schmundt continued, and was doing all he could to get more men to the front. He then added, “It is extremely regrettable that. . . the Fuhrer has not been properly briefed about the seriousness of the situation”! Then Bock pointed out, as he had to Halder at noon, that he had absolutely no reserves left. He closed by saying that his health was hanging “by a silken thread” and that, if the Fuhrer believed that a fresh mind was needed there, he should not hesitate out of consideration for him (Bock). Schmundt said that he understood and would pass Bock’s report on to Hitler. This exchange certainly places Hitler in a better light than many later accounts do. Bock obviously had no solutions to offer; he appears to have been trying to find someone to take responsibility for the untenable position in which he had helped to place his army group.”

Geoffrey P. Megargee, Inside Hitler's High Command (University Press of Kansas, 2000), p. 151.


Hitler took responsibility for the decision to hold the line, and his argument to do so seems rather solid:

First Hitler called Bock at about half past midnight. He had, he said, just heard Bock’s report from Schmundt. He went on to explain his reasons for demanding that the troops hold: if they retreated, in a few days they would find themselves in the same predicament, but without any heavy weapons or artillery. There is no choice but to hold, he said. Bock replied that he had already issued such an order, but that the situation was so tense that the army group’s front might be torn wide open at any moment. Hitler said that he himself would have to accept responsibility for that.

Ibid., p. 152.


In this case Bock had no alternative solutions for what to do, so Hitler made the most logical choice one possibly could at that moment.

JohnnieDarko wrote:Hitler was a smart man he knew that the type of war he got Germany into.


If he did, it was only after all his attempts to limit the war (and even avoid it all together, although he didn't think this was likely at all) had come to nothing due to the various actions of the Allies. Whether it be Roosevelts stated intention as early as January 1939 to involve himself in a war against Germany alongside France, Britain and Poland, to which the latter three countries were fully aware and encouraged their intransigence throughout the year leading to war. Or Roosevelt's purposeful desire to avoid informing the Polish government of the secret protocol of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact concerning the demarcation line between Germany and Russia through Poland, of which Washington became aware due to the activities of a traitor in the German embassy in Moscow. As it was also the secret protocol of the alliance with Poland that the only conditions on which the Allies would come to her aid was if attacked by Germany would've been mooted had it been informed of the Russian intentions. After all, the Allies had no interest in Poland, if she had, no such protocol would've been necessary. Hitler was thus led to assume the war was about Poland (a "fact" which he doubted and intended to use against the allies to call their bluff and thus prove their dishonesty by invoking, rightfully, Russia's role in his offer of peace on October 6 nullifying any reason to continue the war further, as Hitler knew they couldn't do for Poland once the Soviets got involved), when in reality Poland was nothing more than an icebreaker with which Britain, France and the USA were to find their excuse to go to war against Germany. Hence their aversion to a war with Russia over the same principles.

The reality is that Hitler had never intended the kind of war which resulted in the end, but the Allies certainly did. Hitler's war with both Russia and the United States were justified on logical and strategical ground, not "irrational" ideological ones. All were intended to limit the war, not expand it. Hitler as could be understood, couldn't allow his enemies to surround him and do as they pleased on their own timetable while he stood in a position that wasn't secure. The attack on Russia which was on the one hand, a response to Soviet aggression and further demands, but also due to the desire to knock out a possible alliance partner for the West in hopefully 5 weeks, was optimistic for sure, but betrays in no sense that Hitler anticipated any large scale war. If you've listened to his conversation with Marshal Manheim in Finland, one can see how surprised Hitler was at the extent of Soviet armaments. Martin Broszat correctly writes:

Hitler's decision in the fall of 1940 to attack the Soviet Union was not a calculated plan for the realization of the idea of the East [Lebensraum], but rather a forced move to get out of the war of waiting in the summer of 1940 and to reach a conclusion that would decide the war. Only when, for military reasons, the decision to fight the Soviet Union had been made, was the ideological motivation brought in and taken at its word, and then played a similarly self-destructive role for the nature of the occupation policy as the Final Solution of the Jewish Question and objectively meant the end of further movement and expansion.

Martin Broszat, "Soziale Motivation und Führer-Bindung des Nationalsozialismus", Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, Volume 18 (1970), No. 4, pp. 392-409, here p. 408.

JohnnieDarko
Member
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:13 pm

Re: How Did Hitler Die?

Postby JohnnieDarko » 1 year 3 months ago (Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:04 pm)

Otium I don't quite agree with everything you said so I will try to resume my thoughts.

The Hitler decisions being distorted by his generals it goes both ways, specially because some of his general were afraid to tell what was really going on and Hitler is also at fault because he didn't fully trust his generals. Hitler made several mistakes, like letting Goering finish the battle of Dunkirk, and keep pushing the invasion of Britain when they were having many losses. So there's ambiguity in those statements because Hitler gave great orders but he also made some big mistakes. Unfortunately I don't have the time to pull sources but this is a really good discussion even if I don't fully agree with some statements.

As for my comments that Hitler knew what type of war he got germany into I'm talking late war, I'm talking last weeks when everything was doomed of course this was not the war he wanted in the very beginning but it escalated in something so big that's was really out of control. United States dropping two atomic bombs at the end of the war show how out of control this whole war was.

I also don't agree with your statement that Poland was the excuse for Britain, France and USA to go to war with Germany because they could have done that with Sudetenland which include key Czechoslovak military defense positions. And USA didn't want to go to war, the people were not willing to go Europe to fight a war, another terrible blow for the war was the stupid attack by the Japanese on pearl harbor that gave them the motivation to fight, even so Hitler could had delayed the USA response in Europe by not declaring war on them, Japan was a major setback for Germany too. As for Poland France and England had no choice to declare war because they were afraid, no one in Europe wanted a war at that point not even Hitler, the invasion of Poland was risky but it payed of. But like I've said they ended up wanting too much too quick and that led to their defeat, otherwise I think Germany would win the war.

Otium and Hermod I would love to continue this interesting discussion and be able to cite some good points but unfortunately I don't have much time in hands. I agree with some points and we share similar view but I think other points are completely opposed and that's what keeps a ln interesting argument and conversation
I hope to discuss this more with you guys and with more time! Thank you for sharing your points of views!


Return to “WWII Europe / Atlantic Theater Revisionist Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest