JLAD Prove Me Wrong wrote:Lamprecht wrote:It is known from studies on non-White minorities in the USA that a strong ethnic identity is associated with higher self esteem and positive mental health in adolescents. There are no studies of this on Whites (it would be called "Racist") but I fail to see why they would be the sole exception to this rule.
Which studies? I would be interested to see these. And do they really ban white people?
Ban? No, there are just no studies [or they are not published, or I cannot find them] on whether Whites with strong ethnic identities are happier, mentally healthier or have higher self esteem. Why would they do that? Judging by the studies on other minorities, it is only beneficial. So we can't have anything like that existing which shows that Whites benefit by being "Racist" (it is only "Racist" when Whites do it though).
Here are a few, it is not hard to find them but in every single case they are on non-Whites:
-
"Adolescents with positive feelings toward their ethnic group say they are happier on a daily basis than those who have a more negative attitude about their ethnic identity. The study, involving 415 ninth-graders from Chinese and Mexican backgrounds, shows the protective effects of ethnic identity on daily psychological well-being. The researchers... suggest that parents and society in general should encourage strong ethnic identity in families." https://archive.is/xpIf4-
"Black people who identify more strongly with their racial identity are generally happier... blacks with a strong sense of racial identity may feel more connected to their racial group, which in turn makes them happy." https://archive.is/srLPu-
"The present study hypothesized that perceiving more frequent messages of cultural socialization-pluralism from parents would indirectly lead to higher self-esteem via stronger ethnic identity... Based on model testing via the bootstrap method (Preacher & Hayes, 2008), the hypothesis was supported." http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.31013-
"Overall, this review supported the conclusion that a strong, positive ethnic identity benefits adolescent mental health and academic success." https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840701233099-
"His team found that a sense of ethnic identity is indeed associated with positive psychological outcomes for youth in immigrant families, including high self-esteem, a greater sense of happiness, and better academic adjustment." https://archive.is/LGtSk-
"correlational analyses revealed a significant and positive relationship between ethnic identity and self-esteem for all groups." https://link.springer.com/article/10.10 ... 4.93635.68-
"Ethnic identity was positively related to self-esteem and negatively to depression" https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10. ... 1003771783Like I said, the results are consistent for all the various ethnic groups, but Whites are never included. If you ever find a study which includes Whites on this subject, I would like to see it. Another note, while researching something else I found that of all racial and ethnic groups in the USA, White adolescents report enjoying school the least of all! Hmm, I wonder why? Holocaust class, followed by a lesson on slavery (no mention of it anywhere else in the world), then a lesson on how the poor Amerinds were treated, and then at the end of the day diversity class...
The reason Jews get so emotional when you tell them the holocaust is a lie, is because you are destroying the umbrella which shields them from criticism, gets them money, and which guilts gentile whites. They cannot have that, so they get very angry at you. Myself, I would be happy to learn that my ancestors were not murdered in horrific ways, but what do I know? I'm a gentile.
It may be more than that, it may not be conscious or deliberate. What is curious though is how they believe that accusing some Jews of fabricating "Holocaust" claims (something that is admitted to by historians) is the most evil thing ever, but somehow accusing Germans of war crimes they may not have committed is perfectly OK. And for German people to think they can debate certain war crimes they are accused of is heresy, tantamount to declaring more Jews must be shoved into gas chambers. It's insane.
From:
viewtopic.php?p=92377#p92377A Jew writing about ethnic guilt regarding the Germans:
"And so it is no accident that I, a Jew, someone not burdened by past guilt, should have tackled the question of how these descendants of the perpetrators come to terms with the problem"A Jew, not burdened by past guilt, something to be reserved for Germans (even those not alive at the time)?
And the Simon Wiesenthal Center head says the Holodomor is not genocide because that would mean Jews are responsible:
viewtopic.php?t=12269And of course as pointed out in the OP recommended links, the post important thing about being Jewish is rated "Remembering the Holocaust". And it's not just that, according to Malcom X, Jews have also been at the forefront of promoting ethnic tension between Blacks and Whites to keep the focus off themselves:

Jews lived as minorities among host populations for thousands of years. If certain ethnocentric or collectivist behaviors have a genetic or heritable component, and they do, then if 2% of Jews assimilated into European Christian population every year (just a hypothetical number I made up, I don't know of any real figures) then that would end up changing the entire genome of the Jewish gene pool in this regard. If a population selects against a phenotype that promotes assimilation, or is anti-ethnocentrism/collectivism/whatever over a long period of time, you are selecting against the genotype which causes this behavior (in a certain environment).
Since every generation mixes the genes up, by removing the 2% or so of individuals most predisposed to assimilation (or have the weakest jewish ethnic identity) the trait is being consistently culled from the gene pool. Since this would have been going on to some degree every generation, it's not just reducing the % of Jews in the population at one point who would be likely to assimilate (essentially, no longer be Jewish) but it's reducing the frequency of "assimilation genes" in the entire population, changing the nature of all of the entire population, not just the ratio of jews who would be likely to assimilate in those circumstances.
But it should be noted that certain Jewish ethnicities today complain about assimilation issues, but that is also due to the fact that most have totally given up their religion and also live in a different sort of environment than in the past, when Jews were seen as untrustworthy outsiders.
See:
Genetic Evidence for Multiple Biological Mechanisms Underlying In-Group Favoritism:
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20974715And a table: (number on the left is the proportion of variance that can be attributed to genetic differences)

The importance of heritability in psychological research: the case of attitudes:
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8426878