Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Volksgenosse
Member
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2021 12:41 pm

Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby Volksgenosse » 1 year 3 months ago (Tue Feb 22, 2022 11:52 am)

According to the official Holocaust narrative, Kremer participated in executions, gassings, medical experiments etc.
These claims are based on his diary. According to mainstream media, Kremer writes about "Sonderaktion", meaning "special action". This is interpreted as gassing.

Wikipedia :


On several occasions in his diary, he mentions the extraction of organs and tissues (which he called "living-fresh material") from living victims, such as on October 15, 1942, when he writes, "Living-fresh material of liver, spleen and pancreas taken from an abnormal individual."[2] Kremer's diary contains descriptions of at least five more similar instances. At his hearing on July 30, 1947, Kremer stated that "I observed the prisoners in this group [to be liquidated] carefully and whenever one of them particularly interested me because of his advanced stage of starvation, I ordered the medical orderly to reserve him and to inform me when this patient would be killed by injection.



Auschwitz museum webpage writes :


Prisoners were also put to death for research purposes in connection with diseases resulting from the effects of starvation on the human organism, particularly “brown liver atrophy” (braune Atrophie). A professor of anatomy from the University of Münster who lectured there on anatomy and human genetics, SS-Obersturmführer Johann Paul Kremer, carried out this research. He chose prisoners who struck him as suitable research subjects from those who asked to be admitted to the hospital, or he simply chose them from among the patients in the hospital.


It is interesting to note that the word " Gas chamber" is nowhere to be found on the diary but only the words " Special Action".
Only in Nuremberg did Kremer referred to the gas chambers in his " confessions"

Example :

18 October 1942

In wet and cold weather was on this Sunday morning present at the 11th special action (from Holland). Terrible scenes when 3 women begged to have their bare lives spared

Notes: 1710 Jewish men, women and children arrive from Holland. 1594 deportees are gassed immediately. Kremer under investigation in Krakow on the 18 July 1947 added to this entry:

“Three women from Holland didn’t want to go to the gas chamber and begged for their lives. They were young and healthy women and yet their pleas weren’t heard, instead the SS men participating in the operation shot them right on the spot."



Can we debunk all this stuff ?
I would be glad to here your opinion and add any information you can about this case.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby Lamprecht » 1 year 3 months ago (Tue Feb 22, 2022 6:01 pm)

Kremer's diary was brought up in this thread by Pon:

Challenge to Believer 'Pon' on so called "Eyewitnesses"
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12767&start=15#p94188

Lamprecht wrote:Pon, first I would like to make clear that I made this thread with you in mind: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12783

You don't have to reply to the thread, I just suggest you check out that document I have posted. It's given to jurors in a criminal trial in order to help them assess validity of eyewitness testimony. It has some good tips. It is of course not the same for "confessions" which is a whole other situation than eyewitness testimony of victims.
Pon wrote:Dr.Johann Paul Kremer,Dozent of Anatomy at the University of Münster.Kremer had volunteered as a member of the General SS in 1935,and he had been detailed to Auschwitz in August 1942 to replace a physician who had fallen ill.There he served until November 20.

Kremer's diary was found when he was arrested,and was immediately recognized as an important piece of evidence of the atrocities committed in Auschwitz.We give here,in the common English translation,a few excerpts.

August 30,1942.Departure from Prague 8.15 a.m.through Böhmisch Trübau,Olmütz, Prerau,Oderberg.Arrival at Concentration Camp Auschwitz at 5.36 p.m.Quarantine in camp on account of numerous contagious diseases (typhus,malaria,dysentery).Received to secret order through garrison physician Hauptsturmführer [Kurt}Uhlenbrock and accommodation in a room (no.26)in the Waffen-SS club-house [Home ].

August 31,1942.Tropical climate with 28 " Centigrade in the shade,,dust and innumerable flies!Excellent food in the Home.This evening,for instance,we had sour duck livers for 0.40 RM,with stuffed tomatoes,tomato salad,etc.Water is infected,so we drink seltzer-water which is served free (mattoni).First inoculation against typhus.Had photo taken for the camp identity card.

September 1,1942.Have ordered SS officer's cap,sword-belt and brace from Berlin by letter.In the afternoon was present at the gassing of a block with Cyclon B against lice.

September 2,1942.Was present for the first time at a special action at 3 a.m.By comparison Dante's inferno seems almost a comedy.Auschwitz is justly called an extermination camp!2

After his arrest,Kremer was extradited to Poland,and he became one of the defendants in the Auschwitz Trial held before the Supreme National Tribunal in Cracow in November and December 1947.During his pre-trial interrogation Kremer was asked to elucidate the various entries of his diary.On August 18,1947,he stated that ";by September 2,1942,at 3 a.m.I had already been assigned to take part in the action of gassing people."

These mass murders took place in small cottages situated outside the Birkenau camp in a wood.The cottages were called ";bunkers " in the SS--men's slang.All SS physicians on duty in the camp took turns to participate in the gassings,which were called Sonderaktion [special action ].My part as a physician at the gassing consisted in remaining in readiness near the bunker.I was brought there by car.I sat in front with the driver and an SS hospital orderly sat in the back of the car with oxygen apparatus to revive SS-men,employed in the gassing, in case any of them should succumb to the poisonous fumes.When the transport with people who were destined to be gassed arrived at the railway ramp,the SS officers selected from among the new arrivals persons fit to work,while the rest -old people,all children, women with children in their arms and other persons not deemed fit to work -were loaded onto lorries and driven to the gas chambers.I used to follow behind the transport till we reached the bunker.There people were driven into the barrack huts where the victims undressed and then went naked to the gas chambers.Very often no incidents occurred,as the SS-men kept the people quiet,maintaining that they were to bathe and be deloused.After driving all of them into the gas chamber the door was closed and an SS-man in a gas mask threw the contents of a Cyclon tin through an opening in the side wall.The shouting and screaming of the victim could be heard through that opening and it was clear that they were fighting for their lives.These shouts were heard for a very short while.I should say for some minutes,but I am unable to give the exact length of time.3

Three days later Kremer witnessed another gassing,and dutifully recorded it in his diary.

September 5,1942.At noon was present at a special action in the women's camp (Moslems)-the most horrible of all horrors.Hschf Thilo,military surgeon,was right when he said to me today that we are located here in the anus mundi In the evening at about 8 p.m.another special action with a draft from Holland.men compete to take part in such actions as they get additional rations -1 /5 litre vodka,5 cigarettes,100 grammes of sausage and bread.Today and tomorrow (Sunday)on duty.4

In Poland,Kremer gave again a full explanation of this entry.On July 17,1947 he testified that ";the action of gassing emaciated women from the women's camp was particularly unpleasant."

Such individuals were generally called Muselmänner [Moslems ].I remember taking part in the gassing of such women in daylight.I am unable to state how numerous that group was. When I came to the bunker they sat clothed on the ground.As the clothes were in fact worn out camp clothes,they were not let into the undressing barracks but undressed in the open.I could deduce from the behaviour of these women that they realized what was awaiting them. They begged the SS-men to be allowed to live,they wept,but all of them were driven into the gas chamber and gassed.Being an anatomist I had seen many horrors,had dealt with corpses,but what I then saw was not to be compared with anything ever seen before.It was under the influence of these impressions that I noted in my diary,under the date of September 5,1942 ";The most horrible of all horrors.Haupsturmführer Thilo was right when he said to me today that we are located here in the anus mundi " I used this expression because I could not imagine anything more sickening and more horrible.

From: https://web.archive.org/web/20020529044838/http://www.holocaustdenialontrial.com/nsindex.html

I will continue posting witness statements, and answering the concerns you have on the witnesses, it's true that details are sometimes wrong in the statements, though I hope to show that some "incredible" details are, in fact, credible and that the details wrong is simply of human error. Some might be intentional, exaggerating the evils of the nazis, this is also human nature when having been through what some of the victims has been through, witness statements should always be taken suspiciously, but without, for that sake, ignoring important facts that only they could bring.


So basically he wrote nothing about gassing in his diaries, except gassing of lice. He wrote about "Special action" which, I am sure you will insist, meant murder. However that is not the case. See:

D. Hebden debunks the word 'sonderaktion' / Kremer diary
viewtopic.php?t=2291

Special Treatment in Auschwitz—Origin and Meaning of a Term
https://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/10-stia.pdf
(see section: 15. The “Special Operations” and Dr. Johann Paul Kremer [beginning page 82])

When Kremer arrived at Auschwitz, a deadly typhus epidemic took place, at some points hundreds died per day. This is why he was saying it was a camp of death or annihilation, and he speaks about this horrible situation a lot in other entries you don't mention. But never does he talk about gassing other people.

In August 1945 Kremer was arrested by the British, and detained in former camp Neuengamme. They confiscated his diary, and then extradited him to Poland in December 1947 where he was sentenced to death at the Krakow trial. This sentence was commuted to life imprisonment but he was released in 1958. However, at another trial he was sentenced in 1960 again for 10 years, but it was considered "served due" due to his prison time in Poland.

The following translation is ommitting something important:
September 2,1942. Was present for the first time at a special action at 3 a.m.By comparison Dante's inferno seems almost a comedy.Auschwitz is justly called an extermination camp!

the German text says "Zum 1. Male draußen um 3 Uhr früh bei einer Sonderaktion zugegen." or:
"For the 1st time present outside at 3 a.m. at a special action"

So the omitted "outside" indicates that the "special action" (which you claim is homicidal gassings) was not inside any sort of building, which is what you claim is true. Also, your "extermination camp" term is a mistranslation. He said "Lager der Vernichtung" which is "camp of annihilation" not "extermination camp". So that's just deceptive, Pon. Not that I think you did that on purpose, but your source of information either did, or was just careless.

As for this quote:
September 5,1942.At noon was present at a special action in the women's camp (Moslems)-the most horrible of all horrors.Hschf Thilo,military surgeon,was right when he said to me today that we are located here in the anus mundi In the evening at about 8 p.m.another special action with a draft from Holland.

The last sentence here is a mistranslation, "Abends wieder bei einer Sonderaktion aus Holland" or:
"In the evening again at a special action from Holland"
The translation you provided suggests that a special action was performed against the individuals in the transport, but actually the correct translation is that the transport itself was the special action!

If these entries meant extermination, why didn't he destroy them? The "Special actions" are clearly in reference to obtaining transports.

He says the SS men who volunteered for "special actions" got extra food, cigarettes, alcohol, etc. So probably it had something to do with cleaning the trains the people arrived in, or something else that is quite unenjoyable. There isn't any reason to think it was gassing Jews.

The "Bunker" he talks about was likely Block 11 which served as a brig (jail, prison) and executions took place outside of it. The women who "begged ... to be allowed to live" were possibly sentenced to death and were sent to be executed. Or maybe they just thought they were going to be gassed, because of rumors -- there are many examples of jews saying "we went to the gas chamber, people told us we were going to die, but instead, water came out!" Maybe someone told them they were going to be gassed, even though they weren't?

As for Kremer's "Confessions" as a prisoner in captivity, this was to save his own life. He had every reason to tell the lies his captors wanted to hear. It was a successful strategy. The proof is in the pudding so to speak: he was not executed, and his second sentence of 10 years imprisonment he did not even have to serve! Imagine if he said "Nobody was gassed! It's a lie!" he would have certainly been executed -- that was no defense at all. He was 77 years old at the time, who can blame him for not wanting to spend his last moments alive imprisoned?

Let's also be clear, Kremer was very critical of the NSDAP in his diary, despite being a member. I can post some quotes in his diary about it but it would maybe clutter the thread, so I will not post them unless asked. Perhaps you could make another thread focused on this individual.

Pon, do you really think "Confessions" prove very much when it was beneficial for the individual who was imprisoned to tell whatever lie his prosecutors wanted to hear?

Some Auschwitz workers that Pon loves to ignore:
- Another example I would like to bring up is Josef Kramer (yes, different last name). Initially, Kramer, who was a former commandant of Auschwitz (but later Bergen Belsen) said that the allegations of mass murder by gas chamber were false. Later, he said that they were real. Why did he change his mind? Because it was in his benefit to tell the lies the victors wanted told.

- Hans Aumeier, deputy commandant of Auschwitz, said in a statement on 29 June 1945 that nobody was gassed when he was at Auschwitz.

- Richard Baer said nobody was gassed at Auschwitz either, and reports said nothing would dissuade him from this belief. He was the only defendant to not show up at the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial in 1963. He died "in a highly mysterious way" in prison

- SS-Obersturmführer Robert Mulka, who was adjutant to Rudolf Hoess, denied he even knew about the alleged gassings

- Karl Höcker, Mulka's successor as adjutant of the camp commandant, believed "that inmates in Auschwitz were basically not killed."

- Fritz Gaar claimed: "Although I was working for longer then 4 years in Auschwitz I did not notice anything about prisoners being gassed there"

- Dr. Mengele, the infamous "Angel of Death" stated: "I gave life in Auschwitz, I did not take it."

- Fritz Frenzel, Hermann Hagerhoff, and Walter Otto (Auschwitz camp guards) and Ernst Romeikat and Theodor Grewe (Auschwitz administration of inmate property) all stated that they had no personal knowledge of the alleged mass killings.

- Thies Christophersen, stationed at Auschwitz, and author of the book "The Auschwitz Lie" also rejected the claims of homicidal gas chambers. "During the time I was in Auschwitz, I did not notice the slightest evidence of mass gassing"

In Pon's conspiracy theory, anyone claiming that they were at Auschwitz and there were no gassings was just a liar. Anyone who, under any circumstances, claims there were is not a liar, even if they say other things which are not true; we should just ignore that they say absurd things like "5 people were cremated in 1 oven muffle in 10 minutes" and trust anything they say about gassings. This is, of course, laughable.


Suggested reading on Kremer:

lies about the Kremer diary / his trials
viewtopic.php?t=390

Confessions of SS Men who were at Auschwitz (Kremer in particular is focused on)
https://codoh.com/library/document/1982/
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer


NOTE: I am taking a leave of absence from revisionism to focus on other things. At this point, the ball is in their court to show the alleged massive pits full of human remains at the so-called "extermination camps." After 8 decades they still refuse to do this. I wonder why...

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby hermod » 1 year 3 months ago (Tue Feb 22, 2022 6:51 pm)

Lectures on the Holocaust, by Germar Rudolf :

"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

Archie
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2020 12:44 am

Re: Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby Archie » 1 year 3 months ago (Tue Feb 22, 2022 9:29 pm)

The Faurisson article Lamprecht posted is a good place to start.

One thing I noticed they do with this is mix quotes from the "diary" with Kremer's postwar testimony. If you look at just the words in the diary, it's not so impressive. It only looks like something if you've been primed with holocaust memes your whole life.

Otium

Re: Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby Otium » 1 year 3 months ago (Tue Feb 22, 2022 10:10 pm)

I don't think the Kremer diary supports the Holocaust, mainly because he makes no explicit mention of anything that supposedly occurred; which as Rudolf points out would be rather unlikely considering his critical comments about the NS-Regime. However, I must express my scepticism at Rudolf's interpretation of Kremer's use of the phrase Sonderaktion from the entry on October 12.

Germar writes:

The entries for Sept. 5 and Sept. 12 contradict the assertion that the term “Sonderaktionen” (special actions) refers to homicidal gassings, as is frequently implied. He uses the term in the phrase bei einer Sonderaktion aus Holland” (at a special action from Holland), which clearly indicates that the term refers to the deportation of Dutch Jews. Otherwise, he would have written “Sonderaktion an Juden aus Holland” (special action on or with Jews from Holland.)

Germar Rudolf, Lectures on the Holocaust: Controversial Issues Cross-Examined (Uckfield: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017), p. 446.


I don't think this interpretation is "clear" at all; because after a careful reading, particularly of the word "at" (bei) in Kremer's entry, he's clearly stating that he was "at a special action"; which implies that the "special action" was not in reference to transports, but to some separate event that happens after a transport. i.e. a "Sonderaktionen" was not the transport itself. Otherwise, why would Kremer be writing that he was "at" a "special action" and not "with" one? To help explain the way I'm reading it here, which is a bit difficult to explain, it's like writing that someone is "at a birthday party from Holland" (replace "birthday party" with "gassing" and it would make more sense, although I am not suggesting this is what Kremer meant). When you fill in the blank, in this case "Sonderaktionen" for what it's supposed to refer to (?) you get something else that doesn't quite make sense. Nonetheless, whatever "Sonderaktionen" refers to, seems to be distinct from the reference to the Jews from Holland.

If Kremer had written that he was "with a special action from Holland" that would make a lot more sense, and be totally unambiguous in terms of Rudolf's interpretation being what he says it is.

So, it seems that this entry can be interpreted in favour of the exterminationists. But it isn't conclusive by any means.

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby hermod » 1 year 3 months ago (Wed Feb 23, 2022 11:19 am)

Otium wrote:Germar writes:

The entries for Sept. 5 and Sept. 12 contradict the assertion that the term “Sonderaktionen” (special actions) refers to homicidal gassings, as is frequently implied. He uses the term in the phrase bei einer Sonderaktion aus Holland” (at a special action from Holland), which clearly indicates that the term refers to the deportation of Dutch Jews. Otherwise, he would have written “Sonderaktion an Juden aus Holland” (special action on or with Jews from Holland.)

Germar Rudolf, Lectures on the Holocaust: Controversial Issues Cross-Examined (Uckfield: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017), p. 446.


I don't think this interpretation is "clear" at all; because after a careful reading, particularly of the word "at" (bei) in Kremer's entry, he's clearly stating that he was "at a special action"; which implies that the "special action" was not in reference to transports, but to some separate event that happens after a transport. i.e. a "Sonderaktionen" was not the transport itself. Otherwise, why would Kremer be writing that he was "at" a "special action" and not "with" one? To help explain the way I'm reading it here, which is a bit difficult to explain, it's like writing that someone is "at a birthday party from Holland" (replace "birthday party" with "gassing" and it would make more sense, although I am not suggesting this is what Kremer meant). When you fill in the blank, in this case "Sonderaktionen" for what it's supposed to refer to (?) you get something else that doesn't quite make sense. Nonetheless, whatever "Sonderaktionen" refers to, seems to be distinct from the reference to the Jews from Holland.


Arrival is part of a deportation if I'm asked. But perhaps the Sonderaktion was the delousing procedure itself. If memory serves me right, Carlo Mattogno's book Special Treatment in Auschwitz shows that.

Image
"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

Otium

Re: Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby Otium » 1 year 3 months ago (Wed Feb 23, 2022 8:21 pm)

hermod wrote:Arrival is part of a deportation if I'm asked. But perhaps the Sonderaktion was the delousing procedure itself. If memory serves me right, Carlo Mattogno's book Special Treatment in Auschwitz shows that.


Yeah, that's a reasonable point also. If he was "at" an arrival of a "special action" then "Sonderaktionen" could reasonably be deduced to mean a reference to transports.

Like I said with replacing the phrase "Sonderaktionen" with whatever it's supposed to represent, you could also change it to "at a transport from Holland", which would again change the meaning of the phrase dramatically in favour of the revisionist position. The ambiguity of the term itself seems to mask the true meaning of the statement because it can be interpreted in a few different ways.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby Lamprecht » 1 year 3 months ago (Wed Feb 23, 2022 9:29 pm)

Let's also remember that the date of the journal entry (Sept. 1942) was well before Krema II came into operation (March 1943).

Special treatment being subjected to a transport could very well be a disinfestation procedure in which they are quarantined for a day after arriving, so that they could be shaved, given showers, clean clothes, and so on before being introduced to the main population of the camp. As Hermod points out, Mattogno provides numerous documents in his book supporting this position.

I don't see why Kremer wouldn't have written in his private diary about something so ghastly as a homicidal gassing if he was there to witness it. A temporary quarantine for newly arriving prisoners for the purposes of hygiene wouldn't be so remarkable for him to dwell on any more than a brief mention.
Otium wrote:
hermod wrote:Arrival is part of a deportation if I'm asked. But perhaps the Sonderaktion was the delousing procedure itself. If memory serves me right, Carlo Mattogno's book Special Treatment in Auschwitz shows that.


Yeah, that's a reasonable point also. If he was "at" an arrival of a "special action" then "Sonderaktionen" could reasonably be deduced to mean a reference to transports.

Like I said with replacing the phrase "Sonderaktionen" with whatever it's supposed to represent, you could also change it to "at a transport from Holland", which would again change the meaning of the phrase dramatically in favour of the revisionist position. The ambiguity of the term itself seems to mask the true meaning of the statement because it can be interpreted in a few different ways.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer


NOTE: I am taking a leave of absence from revisionism to focus on other things. At this point, the ball is in their court to show the alleged massive pits full of human remains at the so-called "extermination camps." After 8 decades they still refuse to do this. I wonder why...

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby hermod » 1 year 3 months ago (Thu Feb 24, 2022 11:40 am)

Lamprecht wrote:Let's also remember that the date of the journal entry (Sept. 1942) was well before Krema II came into operation (March 1943).

Special treatment being subjected to a transport could very well be a disinfestation procedure in which they are quarantined for a day after arriving, so that they could be shaved, given showers, clean clothes, and so on before being introduced to the main population of the camp. As Hermod points out, Mattogno provides numerous documents in his book supporting this position.

I don't see why Kremer wouldn't have written in his private diary about something so ghastly as a homicidal gassing if he was there to witness it. A temporary quarantine for newly arriving prisoners for the purposes of hygiene wouldn't be so remarkable for him to dwell on any more than a brief mention.


Very good point, Lamprecht!! The theory of an experienced doctor not eager to write in minute detail about such an extraordinary thing as a homicidal gassing with hydrogen cyanide in his own private diary (a diary not free of criticism against National Socialist Germany) is bizarre and far-fetched! That theory amounts to the theory of an ornithologist seeing a very rare bird for the 1st time in his life and just writing "I saw a bird today" in his diary. Very implausible to say the least.
"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby hermod » 1 year 3 months ago (Thu Feb 24, 2022 12:03 pm)

Here under is a graphic showing that no homicidal gas chambers were needed to legitimately call Auschwitz "a camp of annihilation" and "anus mundi " in August-September 1942.

Epidemic death toll
Image
https://postimg.cc/d7Hw4V3W
"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby Hektor » 4 weeks 1 day ago (Thu May 11, 2023 10:06 am)

Lamprecht wrote:Kremer's diary was brought up in this thread by Pon:

Challenge to Believer 'Pon' on so called "Eyewitnesses"
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12767&start=15#p94188

Lamprecht wrote:Pon, first I would like to make clear that I made this thread with you in mind: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12783
...
- Richard Baer said nobody was gassed at Auschwitz either, and reports said nothing would dissuade him from this belief. He was the only defendant to not show up at the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial in 1963. He died "in a highly mysterious way" in prison

- SS-Obersturmführer Robert Mulka, who was adjutant to Rudolf Hoess, denied he even knew about the alleged gassings

- Karl Höcker, Mulka's successor as adjutant of the camp commandant, believed "that inmates in Auschwitz were basically not killed."

- Fritz Gaar claimed: "Although I was working for longer then 4 years in Auschwitz I did not notice anything about prisoners being gassed there"

- Dr. Mengele, the infamous "Angel of Death" stated: "I gave life in Auschwitz, I did not take it."

- Fritz Frenzel, Hermann Hagerhoff, and Walter Otto (Auschwitz camp guards) and Ernst Romeikat and Theodor Grewe (Auschwitz administration of inmate property) all stated that they had no personal knowledge of the alleged mass killings.

- Thies Christophersen, stationed at Auschwitz, and author of the book "The Auschwitz Lie" also rejected the claims of homicidal gas chambers. "During the time I was in Auschwitz, I did not notice the slightest evidence of mass gassing"

In Pon's conspiracy theory, anyone claiming that they were at Auschwitz and there were no gassings was just a liar. Anyone who, under any circumstances, claims there were is not a liar, even if they say other things which are not true; we should just ignore that they say absurd things like "5 people were cremated in 1 oven muffle in 10 minutes" and trust anything they say about gassings. This is, of course, laughable.
...
Confessions of SS Men who were at Auschwitz (Kremer in particular is focused on)
https://codoh.com/library/document/1982/



Indeed, most accused denied any knowledge of homicidal gassings in Auschwitz... If they knew, they'd have had likely a different defense strategy.
Perhaps collecting statements on record of 'lack of knowledge' about homicidal gassings could be useful. It's only Thies Christophersen that did tell a bit more about him. But since he 'is a Nazi' this somehow doesn't count. Talking about bias here. Incoherent bias in that. Because Kaduk @ Co. were actually believed in their admissions. So was blue haze Richard Boeck, who seems to have been rewarded afterwards for his cooperation.

Christophersen was exiled after his booklet. And well, probably not liked by the government, because he was also in a small political organization not to the regime's liking. The report is far-going credible. At least when you don't put on the "Nazi-glasses", which are essentially what you need to further believe in this charade.

It would be of interest to have more notes, letters from former people relating to the "Auschwitz Complex". But the vast majority of those people aren't exactly the people that would write diaries or essays on anything. At best they send a Christmas-card to friends and family, but that's it.

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby hermod » 4 weeks 1 day ago (Thu May 11, 2023 2:20 pm)

Lamprecht wrote:Confessions of SS Men who were at Auschwitz (Kremer in particular is focused on)
https://codoh.com/library/document/1982/


An SS man, Paul Ludwig Waldmann, also confessed the existence and use of the notorious Nazi pedal-driven brain-bashing machine... :roll:

"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

Whodunnit?
Member
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:36 pm

Re: Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby Whodunnit? » 4 weeks 1 day ago (Thu May 11, 2023 11:54 pm)

"Oh ****, we are losing! Quick, let's dig out all the millions of rotting corpses and make them disappear, so that nobody can accuse us of having killed those 6 million jews that are missing. And quick, level the concentration camps, so that nobody finds the gas chambers and so on.

Then surrender to what we have called "judeo-bolsheviks" for 12 years, the people we accused of being extremly vengeful and sadistic, but pretend like we dindu nuffin. Just say something like, uuuuh, these ***** said they wanted to go buy cigarettes and never came back, or whatever, gnahaha"

(3 months later)

"Dear diary, now I will surrender to these sadistic judeo-bolsheviks and pretend like I don't know where all these millions of jews that we killed are. We have successfully made all the evidence disappear. When they'll ask me where all the Jews are I will just say that all of the sudden their index fingers started glowing and then a flying saucer appeared and shwoooop they were all gone, only their shoes were left. We all learned that by heart and I'm sure that'll work. They will never figure out that we gassed and shot them all, with the exception of those we hung and worked to death, and made weird medical experiments on that don't make no sense. But thankfully, I wrote everything down for the generations to come, generations that will understand that we had to kill them all, and for that purpose I'll hide you, my diary, in my buttcrack until all this **** is over, heehee. These stupid ruskis OH HERE THEY CO"

One of us here is ******* stupid.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Have we touched the subject of Dr. Johann Kremer's diary ?

Postby Hektor » 4 weeks 1 day ago (Fri May 12, 2023 1:05 am)

Whodunnit? wrote:"Oh ****, we are losing! Quick, let's dig out all the millions of rotting corpses and make them disappear, so that nobody can accuse us of having killed those 6 million jews that are missing. And quick, level the concentration camps, so that nobody finds the gas chambers and so on.

Then surrender to what we have called "judeo-bolsheviks" for 12 years, the people we accused of being extremly vengeful and sadistic, but pretend like we dindu nuffin. Just say something like, uuuuh, these ***** said they wanted to go buy cigarettes and never came back, or whatever, gnahaha"

That's indeed how the Holocaust spin-doctors are suggesting it must have happened. Well, they didn't think it through, because they merely are looking for a cop-out for the problem that the evidence that should be there, were their thesis true, simply isn't there.

Whodunnit? wrote:(3 months later)
"Dear diary, now I will surrender to these sadistic judeo-bolsheviks and pretend like I don't know where all these millions of jews that we killed are. We have successfully made all the evidence disappear. When they'll ask me where all the Jews are I will just say that all of the sudden their index fingers started glowing and then a flying saucer appeared and shwoooop they were all gone, only their shoes were left. We all learned that by heart and I'm sure that'll work. They will never figure out that we gassed and shot them all, with the exception of those we hung and worked to death, and made weird medical experiments on that don't make no sense. But thankfully, I wrote everything down for the generations to come, generations that will understand that we had to kill them all, and for that purpose I'll hide you, my diary, in my buttcrack until all this **** is over, heehee. These stupid ruskis OH HERE THEY CO"

One of us here is ******* stupid.


Those silly darn Nazis, didn't think that the shoes would prove the fiendish extermination program one day.

Dr. Kremer was actually someone from the outside and not some pre-selected person one could employ in an extermination center.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Archie and 10 guests